Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02484950
NCT02484950
Completed
N/A

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Biologic Augmentation With Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Rush University Medical Center1 site in 1 country62 target enrollmentNovember 15, 2015

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Mesenchymal stem cell augmentation in rotator cuff repair
Conditions
Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear
Sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
Enrollment
62
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without augmentation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Mesenchymal stem cells promote tissue regeneration by differentiating into adult cell lines and by supplying growth factors to their implanted environment. They have been shown to be effective in improving both overall healing and tendon integrity in rotator cuff repair. This study will follow 100 patients in the United States and track their clinical outcomes for at least one year post-operatively.

Detailed Description

Rotator cuff repair is one of the most commonly performed arthroscopic procedures in the United States, but re-tear remains a common long-term complication. This can lead to pain, decreased shoulder function, and the need for corrective surgery. Mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to improve healing rates in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, primarily due to their retained ability to differentiate into several different adult cell lines, such as tenocytes, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts. MSCs further enhance the healing process by releasing growth factors into the local environment to promote tissue regeneration. While MSC augmentation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has led to higher rates of healing and improved tendon integrity, there remains a paucity of data surrounding clinical improvement after the procedure. Outcomes such as post-operative strength, range of motion, and shoulder function have yet to be compared with standard rotator cuff repair. The incidence of post-operative persistent structural defects in the tendon after MSC augmentation must also be further elucidated.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 15, 2015
End Date
June 27, 2024
Last Updated
9 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient is determined to have a full thickness rotator cuff tear (1-3 cm) or partial tear converted to a full-thickness tear-on the pre-operative MRI scan or found arthroscopically-and is scheduled to undergo surgical repair
  • Written informed consent is obtained

Exclusion Criteria

  • Revision surgery
  • Irreparable tear or partial repair
  • Any patient lacking decisional capability
  • Subscapularis involvement

Arms & Interventions

Rotator cuff repair with stem cells

Using clinically accepted methods, subjects will undergo bone marrow aspiration (from hip, proximal humerus or tibia) through a small incision prior to arthroscopy in the group undergoing MSC augmentation. They will then undergo arthroscopic full thickness rotator cuff repair using a double row, TOE anchor/suture technique with mesenchymal stem cell augmentation.

Intervention: Mesenchymal stem cell augmentation in rotator cuff repair

Rotator cuff repair with stem cells

Using clinically accepted methods, subjects will undergo bone marrow aspiration (from hip, proximal humerus or tibia) through a small incision prior to arthroscopy in the group undergoing MSC augmentation. They will then undergo arthroscopic full thickness rotator cuff repair using a double row, TOE anchor/suture technique with mesenchymal stem cell augmentation.

Intervention: Standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Rotator cuff repair without stem cells

Subjects will undergo arthroscopic full thickness rotator cuff repair using a double row, TOE anchor/suture technique, without augmentation of mesenchymal stem cells. To maintain patient blinding, all patients will receive a small incision around the site of expected bone marrow aspiration (hip, proximal humerus, or tibia), regardless of whether or not they receive bone marrow.

Intervention: Standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score

Time Frame: One year

The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score is a patient-reported score that measures shoulder pain, activity level and stability. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better shoulder function. Excellent: 90-100 points Good: 70-89 points Fair: 40-49 points Poor: Less than 39 points

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials