Active Video Games for Older Adults With Knee and/or Hip Osteoarthritis.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, KneeOsteoarthritis, Hip
- Interventions
- Other: Conventional physical rehabilitation alone (CPR)Other: Conventional physical rehabilitation plus Active video games (CPR+AVG)
- Registration Number
- NCT05839262
- Lead Sponsor
- Cristian Alvarez
- Brief Summary
Population aging is currently an issue of primary relevance, constituting an enormous challenge for institutions and society. On the other hand, osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent arthropathy in the elderly, strongly related to loss of functional capacity, limitation of daily activities, increased musculoskeletal pain, and deterioration of quality of life. More specifically, knee and hip OA represent a significant burden for health systems, and in Chile, they are among the ten most frequent diseases in the elderly. The technological development of the last decades has allowed the incorporation of several therapeutic alternatives for the intervention of the elderly, such as virtual reality, which allows interaction with multiple digital environments. Active video games (AVG) or exergames, carried out through commercial non-immersive virtual reality systems, have been proposed as a feasible, innovative, and entertaining alternative to optimize conventional physical rehabilitation (CPR). AVG in healthy older people and those with neurocognitive conditions effectively improves clinical and psychosocial outcomes. However, it has been recommended to advance the study of the effects of AVGs in people with musculoskeletal pathologies, such as knee and hip OA. Accordingly, the purpose is to analyze the effects of an AVG-guided physical exercise protocol adjunct to CPR on functional mobility in older adults with knee and/or hip OA.
- Detailed Description
Osteoarthritis (OA) is highly prevalent, and its incidence increases with aging populations. OA is characterized by articular cartilage degeneration, stiffness, inflammation, and musculoskeletal pain. In addition, the associated deterioration of health-related quality of life may influence therapeutic adherence and progression to future joint replacement. It appears that symptoms rather than structural impairment determine the risk of falling in older people with OA, so pain, loss of strength, and postural balance are underlying mechanisms for both falls and the clinical picture of OA itself. Moreover, the psychosocial sequelae are often underestimated because OA and pain are usually considered benign and unavoidable consequences of aging.
Physical exercise in people with knee and hip OA improves clinical aspects and psychosocial aspects such as self-efficacy, social function, and reduction of depression and isolation, among others. Adherence to exercise is fundamental and is closely related to user satisfaction. There are several barriers to physical exercise by older adults, such as lack of social support, transportation problems, and prioritization of basic needs; however, a determining factor is lack of motivation. In this regard, a study indicates that in Latin America, lack of motivation is among the main reasons for abandoning physical exercise.
The technological development of the last decades has allowed the incorporation of virtual reality into the healthcare field, favoring user motivation. Virtual reality is an experience based on the interactive digital simulation of environments and objects. These systems are categorized as non-immersive, semi-immersive, and immersive. Non-immersive systems use monitors or television screens, semi-immersive systems use panoramic screens to enhance the immersive experience, and immersive systems use head-mounted displays or multi-projected environments that generate a strong sense of immersion. It has been posited that the cost and expertise required to operate immersive systems may hinder their widespread use in clinical settings. In addition, the immersive sensation could produce symptoms such as visual fatigue and dizziness (cybersickness). On the other hand, non-immersive systems using commercially available home consoles are now considered an attractive and more accessible alternative to more sophisticated immersive systems.
Unlike traditional video games that use a standard command or joystick, active video games (AVGs) (also called exergames) use motion monitoring systems such as accelerometers, gyroscopes, haptic technology, and video capture. AVGs have been defined as a "combination of video game technologies and exercise routines to motivate physical activity among individuals or groups," recognizing that exercise in older people requires a greater understanding of the complexity of interaction with computer systems.
Conventional physical rehabilitation (CPR) consists of traditional physical exercises that improve functional capacity. Over the past few years, it has been suggested that incorporating AVGs into CPR can optimize clinical and psychosocial outcomes in the elderly. AVGs have been reported to promote improvements in functional mobility, coordination, muscle strength, and cognitive function in older people. In addition, AVGs improve walking ability and postural balance, as well as social well-being (perception of loneliness, social connectedness, and positive attitudes). However, this research has focused on healthy elderly and patients with neurocognitive pathologies. On the other hand, little information is available on older people with musculoskeletal conditions such as OA. In this regard, a systematic review conducted in patients with knee and/or hip OA indicates that the evidence is insufficient and inconclusive regarding the effectiveness of AVGs. Moreover, one study concludes that AVGs are a feasible and acceptable intervention for patients with knee OA. Interestingly, both studies raise the benefits and potential of AVGs in this population, urging further clinical trials.
Research question: In older adults with knee and/or hip OA. Is AVG-guided physical exercise adjunct to CPR more effective than CPR alone in improving clinical and psychosocial outcomes?
Working hypothesis: In older adults with knee and/or hip OA, AVG-guided physical exercise adjunct to CPR is more effective than CPR alone in improving clinical and psychosocial outcomes.
General objective: To determine the effects of an AVG-guided physical exercise program adjunct to CPR on clinical and psychosocial outcomes in older adults with knee and/or hip OA attended at a community-based family health center.
Specific objectives:
1. To characterize the study sample from sociodemographic, anthropometric, clinical, and psychosocial perspectives.
2. To compare the results of the primary outcome (functional mobility) and secondary outcomes between the study groups (experimental and control) in the different instances of outcome measurement.
3. To evaluate the clinical significance of the interventions and the clinical relevance of the interventions as perceived by the participants.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Age ≥60 and ≤84 years.
- Diagnosis of mild or moderate OA of the knee and/or hip.
- Independent walking capacity of at least 15 meters.
- Inability to interact with active video games.
- Undergoing treatment with opioids or other medications with a potential influence on the outcomes of interest.
- <13 points in the abbreviated version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-EFAM).
- OA associated with infectious, autoimmune, fractures or surgery.
- Participate or have participated in another physical-cognitive rehabilitation program during the last 3 months.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Control group Conventional physical rehabilitation alone (CPR) Conventional physical rehabilitation alone (CPR) Experimental group Conventional physical rehabilitation plus Active video games (CPR+AVG) Conventional physical rehabilitation plus Active video games (CPR+AVG)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Functional mobility. Five-time points. Baseline (pre-intervention); at week 4 (after ten sessions from baseline); at week 7 (after 20 sessions from baseline); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). In addition, four weeks after the completion of the intervention. Timed Up and Go (TUG). Number of seconds required to get up from seated position, walk 3 m, turn, and return to seated position on chair.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Lower body flexibility Five-time points. Baseline (pre-intervention); at week 4 (after ten sessions from baseline); at week 7 (after 20 sessions from baseline); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). In addition, four weeks after the completion of the intervention. Chair sit-and-reach. From sitting position at front of chair, with leg extended and hands reaching toward toes, number of inches (+or - ) from extended fingers to tip of toe
Change in Aerobic endurance. Five-time points. Baseline (pre-intervention); at week 4 (after ten sessions from baseline); at week 7 (after 20 sessions from baseline); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). In addition, four weeks after the completion of the intervention. 2-min step test. Number of full steps completed in 2 min,raising each knee to point midway between patella and iliac crest (score is number of times right knee reaches target)
Change in Cognitive performance. Three-time points. Baseline (pre-intervention); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). In addition, four weeks after the completion of the intervention. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. Score obtained in the development of the tests. It considers executive functions, attention, abstraction, memory, language, viso-constructive abilities, calculation and orientation. MoCA scores range from 0 to 30; higher scores indicate a better cognitive performance.
Change in Upper body flexibility. Five-time points. Baseline (pre-intervention); at week 4 (after ten sessions from baseline); at week 7 (after 20 sessions from baseline); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). In addition, four weeks after the completion of the intervention. Back scratch. With one hand reaching over shoulder and one up middle of back, number of inches between extended middle fingers (+ or - )
Change in Pressure pain threshold Five-time points. Baseline (pre-intervention); at week 4 (after ten sessions from baseline); at week 7 (after 20 sessions from baseline); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). In addition, four weeks after the completion of the intervention. Wagner® FPX-25 algometer. It is expressed in kilogram/cm2.
Change in Health-related quality of life Three-time points. Baseline (pre-intervention); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). In addition, four weeks after the completion of the intervention. SF-12v2 Chile-Spanish Questionnaire. Score from 0-100 points. Assessment of 8 dimensions (physical functioning \[PF\], role-physical \[RP\], bodily pain \[BP\], general health \[GH\], vitality \[VT\], social functioning \[SF\], role-emotional \[RE\], and mental health \[MH\]), and two summary scores (physical component summary \[PCS\] and mental component summary \[MCS\]).
Adherence to treatment One-time point. At week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). Number of effective assistances at the end of treatment. A participant with an attendance ≥2/3 of the total (30 sessions) is considered "adherent" (≥20 sessions).
Change in Therapeutic alliance Three-time points. At week 4 (after ten sessions from baseline); at week 7 (after 20 sessions from baseline); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). Subscale of the Pain Rehabilitation Expectations Scale (PRES). The score ranges from 1 to 44; a higher score is a higher therapeutic alliance.
Change in Lower body strength. Five-time points. Baseline (pre-intervention); at week 4 (after ten sessions from baseline); at week 7 (after 20 sessions from baseline); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). In addition, four weeks after the completion of the intervention. 30-s chair stand. Number of full stands in 30 s with arms folded across chest
Change in Hand grip strength Five-time points. Baseline (pre-intervention); at week 4 (after ten sessions from baseline); at week 7 (after 20 sessions from baseline); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). In addition, four weeks after the completion of the intervention. Number of kg measured with a Jamar dynamometer.
Change in Upper body strength. Five-time points. Baseline (pre-intervention); at week 4 (after ten sessions from baseline); at week 7 (after 20 sessions from baseline); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). In addition, four weeks after the completion of the intervention. 30-s arm curl. Number of bicep curls in 30 s holding hand weight (women 5 lb; men 8 lb)
Change in Functional disability. Five-time points. Baseline (pre-intervention); at week 4 (after ten sessions from baseline); at week 7 (after 20 sessions from baseline); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). In addition, four weeks after the completion of the intervention. Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire. Score obtained on the scale of items grouped into 3 dimensions: pain, stiffness and difficulty in performing tasks. Scores range from 0 to 96, where 0 represents the best health status and 96 the worst possible status.
Change in Pain intensity. Five-time points. Baseline (pre-intervention); at week 4 (after ten sessions from baseline); at week 7 (after 20 sessions from baseline); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). In addition, four weeks after the completion of the intervention. Visual Analog Scale (VAS). 100 mm straight line with two labels ("no pain" and "worst possible pain") at each end.
Change in User satisfaction Three-time points. At week 4 (after ten sessions from baseline); at week 7 (after 20 sessions from baseline); and week 10 (after 30 sessions from baseline). The average score of 3 questions (overall level of satisfaction, expectation fulfillment, and recommendations to others) using a scale of 1 to 7 points, where 1 is the worst evaluation, and 7 is the best evaluation.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Centro de Salud Familiar (CESFAM) Lorenzo Arenas
🇨🇱Concepción, Chile