Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06521385
NCT06521385
Completed
N/A

Comparison of Non-invasive Respiratory Monitoring System (RMS) to Capnography for Respiratory Rate (RR)

Makani Science1 site in 1 country32 target enrollmentMay 17, 2024

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Makani Science Respiratory Monitoring System
Conditions
Respiratory Monitoring
Sponsor
Makani Science
Enrollment
32
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Respiratory Rate Accuracy Compared Between Experimental and Reference Devices
Status
Completed
Last Updated
last month

Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the performance of a novel non-invasive respiratory monitoring system against the gold standard methods (capnography) in human subjects. The main question it aims to answer is whether the novel monitoring system comparable to the current standards.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 17, 2024
End Date
July 2, 2024
Last Updated
last month
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Makani Science
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Between age of 22-99
  • BMI between 15 and 40 kg/m\^2

Exclusion Criteria

  • Medical history of serious symptomatic, cardiac, or pulmonary disease.
  • History of serious skin irritation (severe rash or blisters) caused by medical adhesives (tape).
  • Cannot lay still for one (1) hour.
  • Cannot give written informed consent.
  • Unable to follow instructions.

Arms & Interventions

Device Arm

Subjects with both the reference and experimental device placed for paired data collection

Intervention: Makani Science Respiratory Monitoring System

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Respiratory Rate Accuracy Compared Between Experimental and Reference Devices

Time Frame: 1 hour

Mean absolute error (MAE) was calculated for concurrent respiratory rate measurements obtained from the Makani Science system (experimental device) and capnography (reference device). MAE was defined as the average of the absolute differences between the experimental and reference measurements. The lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval were also calculated for each MAE. Device performance was considered acceptable if the MAE was within 3 breaths per minute (BPM) of the reference device.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Respiratory Rate Bias Compared Between Experimental and Reference Devices(1 hour)
  • Makani Science System Performance After Simulated Breathing Artifacts(15 minutes)
  • Makani Science System Performance With Subject Laying on the Right Side(15 minutes)
  • Makani Science System Performance With Subject Laying on the Left Side(15 minutes)
  • Makani Science System Performance With Subject Laying in the Reclined Position(15 minutes)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials