A Prospective Study of the Impact of Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole Brain Radiotherapy on Neurocognitive Function Decline
- Conditions
- Brain MetastasisBrain Metastases
- Interventions
- Radiation: hippocampal-sparing WBRT
- Registration Number
- NCT02504788
- Lead Sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Brief Summary
Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has long been a practical and effective therapeutic modality for various settings of management in radiation oncology. For example, the indications for WBRT should include brain metastasis or metastases, the setting of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) used mainly for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer, and even some patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. The rationales for WBRT are essentially based on that it can target both microscopic and gross intracranial disease.
In addition to providing rapid alleviation of neurologic symptoms and enhanced intracranial disease control, WBRT might also prolong the time to develop neurocognitive function (NCF) decline. However, paradoxically NCF decline can also occur due to a sequel of WBRT. In terms of the time course of WBRT-induced NCF decline, it might vary considerably according to the specific domains which are selected to be measured. Early neurocognitive decline occurs within the first 1 - 4 months after WBRT for brain metastases. The domains of early neurocognitive decline principally involve verbal and short-term memory recall.
Since several decades ago, it has been understood that hippocampus plays an essential role in memory function. Not little evidence supports that radiation-induced damage to hippocampus should be strongly associated with NCF impairment. Furthermore, several studies have shown that isodose distribution in hippocampus is closely related to neurocognitive function in patients with benign or low-grade brain tumors. As a consequence, it is hypothesized that conformal hippocampal sparing during the course of WBRT (HS-WBRT) might provide significant preservation in terms of cognitive function.
This prospective cohort study aims to explore and evaluate the impact of the delivery of HS-WBRT on the pattern of NCF change and the extent of NCF decline in patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic WBRT. As compared with previous related and relevant studies, it will also be investigated whether neurocognitive functional preservation can be achieved via the integration of hippocampal sparing with the course of WBRT.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Patients with pathologically-confirmed non-hematopoietic malignancy who are referred for therapeutic or prophylactic WBRT
- Good performance status no worse than Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) of 2 or a general status of Karnofsky Score (KPS) at least 70 %
- The number and extent of brain metastatic lesions should be no more than three metastatic foci with a greatest diameter no more than 4 cm
- Patients with MRI-identified metastasis within 5 mm perihippocampally
- Clinical suspicion of leptomeningeal spreading
- History of prior radiotherapy including stereotactic radiosurgery delivered to brain/head region for any reasons
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Hippocampal-sparing WBRT hippocampal-sparing WBRT All studied patients should undergo a computed tomography (CT) simulation scan encompassing the entire head region with 1.25-mm slice thickness using a thermoplastic mask for immobilization. To achieve conformal hippocampal sparing during the delivery of whole brain radiation (WBRT), the technique of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) via Linac-based RapidArc®.In terms of dose prescription, a dose of 30 Gy in 12 fractions was prescribed to whole-brain planning target volume (PTV) if the role of RT was considered either adjuvant following craniotomy with tumor removal or therapeutic for treating oligometastatic brain disease.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The primary endpoint is delayed recall, as determined by the change/decline in non-verbal memory (WMS III- Visual Reproduction score) from the baseline assessment to 4 months after the start of HS-WBRT. 4 months after the start of HS-WBRT Neurocognitive assessment: including memory, executive functions, and psychomotor speed. This neurocognitive outcome was delayed recall, as determined by the change/decline in either verbal memory \[Wechsler Memory Scale - 3rd edition (WMS III) - Word List score\] or non-verbal memory (WMS III- Visual Reproduction score) from the baseline assessment to 4 months after the start of the course of WBRT with hippocampus sparing (HS-WBRT). Additionally, the follow-up of neurocognitive assessment will also be administered at 12 months and up to 18 months after the start of HS-WBRT.
The primary endpoint is delayed recall, as determined by the change/decline in verbal memory (WMS III- Word List score) from the baseline assessment to 4 months after the start of HS-WBRT. 4 months after the start of HS-WBRT Neurocognitive assessment: including memory, executive functions, and psychomotor speed. This neurocognitive outcome was delayed recall, as determined by the change/decline in either verbal memory \[Wechsler Memory Scale - 3rd edition (WMS III) - Word List score\] or non-verbal memory (WMS III- Visual Reproduction score) from the baseline assessment to 4 months after the start of the course of WBRT with hippocampus sparing (HS-WBRT). Additionally, the follow-up of neurocognitive assessment will also be administered at 12 months and up to 18 months after the start of HS-WBRT.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The time from the date of recruitment to that of intracranial progression/failure noted on brain MRI or CT up to 18 months Overall survival time, indicated by the time from the date of recruitment to the date of expiring up to 18 months
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
🇨🇳Taoyuan, Taiwan