跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03272490
NCT03272490已完成不适用

Polyaxial Locking Plates in Treating Distal Humeral Fractures: a Comparative Randomized Trial for Clinical Outcome

Technical University of Munich0 个研究点目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2014年2月5日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
20
主要终点
Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS)

研究概览

简要总结

20 patients with distal humeral fractures (AO 13-A1 - AO 13-C3) were included in the current study since 2014. After completing the randomization plan, patients were distributed into two groups for different variable angle locking plates (DePuy Synthes VA-LCP vs. Medartis Aptus Elbow). Clinical and radiological follow-ups were conducted 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after the operation.

详细描述

Before study initiation the approval of the local ethics committee of (Trial Number 253/14) was obtained. The clinical trial included 20 patients with fractures of the distal humerus recruited from a level-one university trauma centre. Patient recruitment was conducted between 03/2014 and 12/2015. Fractures of the distal humerus, as defined by the AO classification system (AO 13-A1 - AO 13-C3), were included in this study as they were identified by the treating surgeon being applicable for locking plate treatment and after written informed consent of the patients was obtained. All patients were randomized following a randomization plan (Randlist, DatInf GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) for either being treated with the DePuy Synthes VA-LCP 2.7/3.5 mm (DePuy Synthes, Umkirch, Germany) or with the Medartis Aptus Elbow system 2.0/3.8 mm (Medartis, Basel, Switzerland). Both systems include anatomically preshaped, polyaxial angular stable locking plates in various sizes. Angle stable screw positioning with the freedom of +/- 15° off-axis screw placement gives the surgeon a large variety in both systems.

The inclusion criteria involve all patients from the age of 18 to 95 years who suffered from a distal humeral fracture (AO 13-A1 - AO 13-C3) that had to undergo operative treatment. The exclusion criteria involve all under-aged patients (< 18 years), pregnant patients and patients with a mental disorder as well as patients under comprehensive legal support. In addition, pathological fractures had been excluded from the study.

Surgical technique

All patients were operated by experienced upper extremity surgeons. The mean interval between injury and operation was 2.4 days (range 0-12 days). General anaesthesia was used in all cases and a single dose of 1.5 mg cephalosporin was given preoperatively for prophylaxis. Patients were positioned in prone position with the injured arm on a radiolucent, small padded arm holder. Under tourniquet control, the posterior approach (Bryan-Morrey) to the distal humerus was performed in all cases. Additional olecranon osteotomy was performed in 7 cases (3x DePuy Synthes vs. 4x Medartis Aptus Elbow) presenting with AO type 13 C2 and AO type 13 C3 fractures. Postoperatively, physiotherapy was initiated using the same rehabilitation protocol for both groups. Passive and active assisted ROM was permitted immediately without limitations, while weight bearing was restricted for 6 weeks.

Follow-up evaluation

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 95 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • The inclusion criteria involve all patients from the age of 18 to 95 years who suffered from a distal humeral fracture (AO 13-A1 - AO 13-C3) that had to undergo operative treatment

排除标准

  • The exclusion criteria involve all under-aged patients (< 18 years), pregnant patients and patients with a mental disorder as well as patients under comprehensive legal support. In addition, pathological fractures had been excluded from the study.

研究组 & 干预措施

Medartis

Active Comparator

Surgery using the Medartis Implant

干预措施: Medartis (Procedure)

Synthes

Active Comparator

Surgery using the Synthes implant

干预措施: Synthes (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS)

时间窗: 12 months

clinical and functional outcome

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Technical University of Munich
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr. Chlodwig Kirchhoff

Principal Investigator

Technical University of Munich

相似试验