A Prospective, Single-Blinded, Randomized Study of Awake vs Intubated General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Elective Craniotomy for Supratentorial Glioma Resection
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Adult Brain Tumor
- Sponsor
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Enrollment
- 4
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Compare overall hospital length of stay for patients in each of 2 arms
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 7 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial studies light sedation compared with intubated general anesthesia (a loss of feeling and a complete loss of awareness that feels like a very deep sleep) in reducing complications and length of hospital stay in patients with brain cancer undergoing craniotomy. Craniotomy is an operation in which a piece of the skull is removed so doctors can remove a brain tumor or abnormal brain tissue. Light sedation allows patients to remain awake during their surgery, while intubated general anesthesia puts patients to sleep. Surgery complication rates may be reduced if intubated general anesthesia is avoided. Additionally, patients not receiving intubated general anesthesia tend to recover more quickly after surgery. It is not yet known whether light sedation is better at reducing complications and length of hospital stay compared to intubated general anesthesia.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the overall hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing craniotomy with light sedation vs. general anesthesia. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare resource utilization between the two groups. II. To assess the frequency of post-operative delirium. III. To measure patient perceptions. IV. To track patient complications during hospital stay - nausea/vomiting, pain, hematology/lab stability, hemodynamic stability. V. To track re-admission and extended hospital stay rates. VI. To compare cost of both approaches. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive light sedation (awake) and undergo craniotomy. ARM II: Patients receive intubated general anesthesia and undergo craniotomy. After completion of study, patients are followed up at 1month and 1 year.
Investigators
James Elder
Principal Investigator
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Non-pregnant females
- •Elective craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumors
- •Primary brain cancer (presumed gliomas with no radiographic or clinical evidence of metastatic disease to the brain)
- •First craniotomy
- •American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III
- •Body mass index (BMI) \< 35
Exclusion Criteria
- •Posterior fossa tumor/approach for tumor resection requiring the prone position
- •Traumatic lesions/hematomas
- •Emergency case
- •Systemic disease burden with metastatic tumor to the brain
- •Presence of medical co-morbidities, which, in the opinion of the investigator complicates the surgical procedure or would require additional hospital stay
- •Necessity of awake procedure requiring intraoperative participation of patient due to the presence of the lesion in eloquent brain areas
- •Prisoners
- •Pregnant women
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Compare overall hospital length of stay for patients in each of 2 arms
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Will be summarized for each arm and compared between light sedation and general anesthesia arm using two-sample test. Regression model will also be used to study the association between the length of stay and the type of anesthesia with potential confounder variables.
Secondary Outcomes
- Compare resource utilization between two groups(Up to 1 year)
- Assess the frequency of post-operative delirium(Up to 1 year)
- Measure patient perceptions(Up to 1 year)
- Track patient complications during hospital stay(Up to 1 year)
- Track re-admission and extended hospital stay rates(Up to 1 year from the date of surgery)