跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05975294
NCT05975294尚未招募不适用

Prospective Comparative Study Between Ultrasound-guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block and the Use of Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia for Management of Pain in Patients With Multiple Fracture Ribs

Sohag University0 个研究点目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2023年8月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
60
主要终点
• Pulmonary function to evaluate mean change in incentive spirometry volume

研究概览

简要总结

Rib fractures are common after blunt injury to the chest. Present in 10% of blunt trauma admissions. Pain associated with rib fractures can result in compromise of pulmonary function causing hypoxaemia or pneumonia, which may require mechanical ventilation. Adequate relief of rib fracture pain allows the patient to breathe deeply, avoid intubation and clear secretions effectively, which will minimise the pulmonary complications .

Pain control is essential for not only primary pain relief but also preventing secondary complications such as atelectasis or pneumonia as well as the transition to chronic pain. Accordingly, further steps are now being taken from the conventional pain control medication and techniques by the introduction of more aggressive pain control measures .Traditional regional anaesthesia (RA) techniques such as paravertebral, intercostal and epidurals injections are resource-intensive and time-consuming, limited to single dermatomes; provide incomplete analgesia of the hemithorax; and are associated with significant potential complications such as local anaesthetic intoxication, vasovagal syncope, hemi diaphragmatic paresis and pneumothorax .

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block. Its use has been documented in numerous instances with positive outcomes in controlling acute as well as chronic pain. The most popular technique was the continuous infusion through a catheter . Fascial plane blocks that can be used for rib fracture pain management are serratus anterior plane block, erector spinae plane block and the rhomboid intercostal and subserratus (RISS) block. The procedure is more simple to use with a lower incidence of complications ,less time consuming , more superficial than others so it can be used in patients on anticoagulant therapy .

Providing analgesia for patients with rib fractures continues to be a management challenge. Therefore, further studies are needed comparing between different techniques to prove their efficacy in pain management

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • • Age 18:60 years
  • Patient with 2 or more unilateral rib fractures.
  • ASA 1 , ASA 2

排除标准

  • • patient refusal
  • History of chronic pain or daily use of analgesics
  • History of psychiatric disorder or inability to understand the consent form or how to use a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain measurement
  • Severe renal or hepatic dysfunction
  • Allergy to any required drug
  • Second thoracic surgery
  • Local infection at the injection site
  • Spinal deformity
  • head injury
  • lung complications related to trauma ( pneumothorax , haemothorax , lung collapse).
  • need of mechanical ventilation

研究组 & 干预措施

Group(E):

Active Comparator

including 30 patients with multiple fracture ribs will undergo ultrasound guided continuous erector spinae plane block with abolus 0.3ml /kg of amixture 0.125% bupivicaine with fentanyl of 2 mic per ml then Infusion of 0.1 ml /kg/hr of the same mixture.

干预措施: amixture 0.125% bupivicaine with fentanyl (Drug)

Group (C)

Active Comparator

including 30 patients with multiple fracture ribs will be given intravenous PCA device of 100 ml volume containing 80 mg of nalbuphine ,180 mg ketorolac, 24mg dexamethasone, 16 mg danset and normal saline at a rate of 2 ml/h.

干预措施: 100 ml volume containing 80 mg of nalbuphine ,180 mg ketorolac, 24mg dexamethasone, 16 mg danset (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

• Pulmonary function to evaluate mean change in incentive spirometry volume

时间窗: 1 year

from pretreatment then 1 h after procedure then daily for 5days including: Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) ,Forced vial capaciy (FVC) and The ratio of the two volumes(FEV1/FVC) and inspiratory capacity (IC).

• VAS pain score

时间窗: 1 year

will be calculated pretreatment then at 0, 0.5h, 1h, 2h , 3h ,6h, 12h and 24h thn daily for 5 days at rest and at movement.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ahmed Mahmoud Azmy

assistant lecteurer anaethesia and ICU department sohag univerisity hospital

Sohag University

相似试验

Prospective Comparative Study Between... | 临床试验