MedPath

The Social Regulation of Threat-related Vigilance and Arousal

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Social Interaction
Anxiety
Discrimination, Racial
Psychological Trauma, Historical
Emotion Regulation
Hypervigilance
Interventions
Behavioral: social support
Registration Number
NCT05558527
Lead Sponsor
University of Nevada, Reno
Brief Summary

This study will examine the effects of social support on threat vigilance and arousal using eye tracking. We will also test the moderating effects of trauma and discrimination history.

Detailed Description

Both interpersonal trauma (IPT) and ethno-racial discrimination amplify risk for hyper-arousal symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but the mechanism of this effect is unclear. Prior research suggests that social support plays an important role in regulating emotional responses, a process called social emotion regulation. This study will test whether a history of IPT and/or ethno-racial discrimination influence the social regulation of arousal and vigilance. Social regulation will be tested by contrasting responses under conditions with and without social support.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
45
Inclusion Criteria
  • In a stable romantic relationship for 6 months or more
  • Normal vision or corrected-to-normal vision
  • Fluent in English
Exclusion Criteria
  • If vision is corrected-to-normal, needs to use hard contact lenses, bifocal contact lenses, or glasses
  • Experienced a traumatic event within the past 4 weeks

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Social support from a strangersocial supportParticipants will hold the hand of a stranger
Social support from a romantic partnersocial supportParticipants will hold the hand of their romantic partner
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Vigilance Related Eye Movements - Number of Eye FixationsCollected from minute 15 to minute 45 of study participation, approximately

Participants will view 15 pictures of natural environmental scenes for 10 seconds per image. We will use an eye tracker to examine the number of eye fixations per scene. A greater number of fixations during the 10 second presentation of a scene would indicate greater vigilance.

Vigilance Related Eye Movements - Visual ScanningCollected from minute 15 to minute 45 of study participation, approximately

Participants will view 15 pictures of natural environmental scenes for 10 seconds per image. We will use an eye tracker to examine the proportion of the scene that they look at (fixate on) out of approximately 80 possible sectors. A greater proportion of the scene they fixate on would indicate greater vigilance.

Threat-Related Physiological Arousal - Pupil DilationCollected from minute 45 to minute 75 of study participation, approximately

Participants will view a series of visual cues (either an 'X' or an 'O') where an 'X' signals a possible (20% probability) aversive auditory stimulus (human scream). We will examine pupil dilation during the task in order to measure arousal in response to uncertain threat. We will calculate average pupil dilation during the wait period after threat cues (X) and after safety cues (O). We will subtract average pupil dilation after safety cues from threat cues to create an index of threat-related arousal. Greater pupil dilation (for threat minus safety cues) would indicate greater threat-related arousal.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Nevada, Reno

🇺🇸

Reno, Nevada, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath