Palonosetron and Hydroxyzine to Reduce Opioid Withdrawal

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Substance-Related Disorders

Interventions: Drug: Palonosetron
Drug: Hydroxyzine
Other: Placebo

Registration Number: NCT00661674

Lead Sponsor: Stanford University

Brief Summary: Opioid medications are commonly used for pain relief. When given over time, physical dependence can occur. This results in unpleasant side effects--such as agitation and nausea--if opioid medications are suddenly stopped. We are interested in knowing if a medication named Ondansetron can help ease or prevent symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal. We are also interested in knowing if a similar (but more potent FDA-approved drug, palonosetron) can more effectively treat withdrawal symptoms with or without combination with an antihistamine called hydroxyzine (vistaril).

Detailed Description: We hope to learn if Palonosetron and/or combination with hydroxyzine can be used to prevent or attenuate the signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal. If we find that it can help prevent these symptoms, it may become a new treatment that can aid patients suffering from these symptoms.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: Male

Target Recruitment: 10

Inclusion Criteria

Healthy males
Ages 18-35
No allergies to morphine or palonosetron
No history of addiction or substance abuse

Exclusion Criteria

Female
Younger than 18 or older than 35
History of substance abuse
Raynaud's disease or coronary artery disease
Allergies to morphine or palonosetron

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: CROSSOVER

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Sequence 2: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo	Placebo	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron Week 2: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 3: Placebo
Sequence 1: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron	Placebo	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Placebo Week 2: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 3: Palonosetron
Sequence 3: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron	Placebo	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 2: Placebo Week 3: Palonosetron
Sequence 4: Placebo, Palonosetron, Combo	Placebo	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Placebo Week 2: Palonosetron only Week 3: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo
Sequence 5: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo	Placebo	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 2: Palonosetron only Week 3: Placebo
Sequence 6: Palonosetron, Placebo, Combo	Placebo	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron only Week 2: Placebo Week 3:Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo
Sequence 1: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron	Palonosetron	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Placebo Week 2: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 3: Palonosetron
Sequence 1: Placebo, Combo, Palonosetron	Hydroxyzine	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Placebo Week 2: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 3: Palonosetron
Sequence 2: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo	Palonosetron	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron Week 2: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 3: Placebo
Sequence 2: Palonosetron, Combo, Placebo	Hydroxyzine	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron Week 2: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 3: Placebo
Sequence 3: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron	Palonosetron	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 2: Placebo Week 3: Palonosetron
Sequence 3: Combo, Placebo, Palonosetron	Hydroxyzine	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 2: Placebo Week 3: Palonosetron
Sequence 4: Placebo, Palonosetron, Combo	Hydroxyzine	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Placebo Week 2: Palonosetron only Week 3: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo
Sequence 4: Placebo, Palonosetron, Combo	Palonosetron	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Placebo Week 2: Palonosetron only Week 3: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo
Sequence 5: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo	Hydroxyzine	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 2: Palonosetron only Week 3: Placebo
Sequence 5: Combo, Palonosetron, Placebo	Palonosetron	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo Week 2: Palonosetron only Week 3: Placebo
Sequence 6: Palonosetron, Placebo, Combo	Palonosetron	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron only Week 2: Placebo Week 3:Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo
Sequence 6: Palonosetron, Placebo, Combo	Hydroxyzine	At T = 0 (minutes), healthy (non-opioid dependent, non-substance abuser) male volunteers (N=10) were pre-treated with either placebo (0.9% normal saline), palonosetron IV (0.75mg), or palonosetron IV (0.75mg) and hydroxyzine per os (PO) (100mg) in a crossover study design. This was followed at T = 30 by intravenous morphine (10mg/70kg). At T = 165, 10mg/70kg naloxone IV was given to precipitate opioid withdrawal. The objective opioid withdrawal score (OOWS) and subjective opioid withdrawal score (SOWS) were determined 5 and 15 minutes after naloxone administration (T = 170, 180, respectively). Baseline measurements were recorded at T = -30 and T = -15. Week 1: Palonosetron only Week 2: Placebo Week 3:Palonosetron + Hydroxyzine Combo

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
OOWS Score	Change from baseline in OOWS score at 180 minutes (15 minutes post naloxone administration)	The OOWS is a 13-item instrument documenting physically observable signs of withdrawal, which are rated as present (1) or absent (0) during the observation period. Maximum score possible = 13, minimum score possible = 0. T=15 minutes post naloxone administration coordinates with T = 180 (min) for the entire study session. OOWS scores at T=180 is the primary outcome measure of the study compared with baseline OOWS scores at T=-30 (30 minutes prior to study medication administration). Reported time frames are in relation to time past since administration of study medications. Mean post-Naloxone OOWS scores (+/- SEM) were determined for pretreatment groups

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
SOWS Score	Change from baseline in SOWS score at 180 minutes (15 minutes post naloxone administration)	The SOWS score is composed of 16 subjective symptoms rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 4=extremely) based on what subjects were experiencing at the time of testing. 15 minutes post naloxone administration coordinates with T = 180 (min) for the entire study session. The highest score possible (64) would indicate that the individual was experiencing every symptom of opioid withdrawal to the fullest extent possible while the lowest score (0) would indicate that the individual was not experiencing any symptoms of opioid withdrawal. Mean post-naloxone SOWS scores (+/- SEM) were computed for pretreatment groups: Placebo, palonosetron, and palonosetron with hydroxyzine