IMPULSE StIMulation of Brain Plasticity to Improve Upper Limb Recovery After StrokE A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Neuroplastic Intervention by Cerebrolysin and atDCS on Motor Function Recovery in Subacute and Chronic Stroke Patients
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Cerebrolysin
- Conditions
- Chronic Stroke
- Sponsor
- Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH
- Enrollment
- 4
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
- Status
- Terminated
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Stroke is a leading cause of adult long-term disability worldwide. Recovery of arm and hand function after stroke is limited to about 50% of patients and full recovery is achieved in only 12% of stroke survivors by 6 months after stroke. Within the first 8-12 weeks post-stroke, a proportional recovery of 70%, corresponding to good recovery, may be achieved, but at later stages no major gain is observed with current therapy practices. Accordingly, there is a need to find new potential therapeutic tools to enhance post-stroke motor recovery. Rehabilitation supported by neuroplastic intervention is a new and pragmatic therapeutic approach in the treatment of stroke, giving way to a concept of 'recovery enhancers'.
The objective of this study is to assess whether an additional therapy with Cerebrolysin and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) increases the success of conventional rehabilitation therapy in subacute and chronic stroke patients with unexploited potential for functional recovery despite intact structural and functional pathways in the brain.
Hypothesis:
The hypothesis is that the combination of Cerebrolysin and atDCS facilitates motor learning in subacute and chronic stroke patients. Accordingly, motor function recovery at day 21 post-baseline is expected to be higher in the verum group (conventional rehabilitation + task-specific motor training + Cerebrolysin + atDCS) as compared to the control group (conventional rehabilitation + task-specific motor training + placebo + sham-transcranial direct current stimulation).
The primary objective is to show a significantly higher proportional recovery rate in the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) at day 21 post-baseline in the verum group as compared to the control group.
The secondary objective is to assess the impact of this neuroplastic intervention on finger dexterity (Nine-hole peg test - 9HPT), hand grip strength, and neurological deficits (National Institutes of Healths Stroke Scale - NIHSS) at the end of therapy (day 21 post-baseline). Safety data are collected throughout the study and thereafter in case of ongoing serious adverse events (SAEs) at study endpoint.
Optional secondary parameters include electroencephalography (EEG) parameters and Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) status analyses to document plastic changes in the brain, in particular changes of the cortical network functionality during neurorehabilitation, and to assess the impact of neuroplastic intervention on the BDNF synthesis rate as well as the influence of different BDNF polymorphisms.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •18-80 years of age, both inclusive, of all sexes
- •8 weeks to 12 months after a first-ever hemispheric subcortical ischemic stroke, confirmed by imaging
- •Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0 or 1
- •Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score 13-50, both inclusive
- •Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension (SAFE) score ≥5
- •Patient participates voluntarily and gave written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- •Disease-related:
- •o Study procedures:
- •Severe sensory deficits (score of 2 on item 8 of the NIHSS)
- •Severe aphasia (a score of ≥2 on item 9 of the NIHSS)
- •Severe neglect (a score of 2 on item 11 of the NIHSS)
- •Co-morbid conditions such as fractures, osteoarthritis, fixed or severely interfering contraction or deformity in the affected limb, polyneuropathy and/or ischemic peripheral disease if the sensorimotor functions of the upper extremities are affected, other neurological disease(s) or known brain abnormalities, acute coronary syndrome, severe heart disease (NYHA class III or IV), cancer, severe liver disease (hepatic disease associated with coagulopathy \[prothrombin time prolonged beyond the normal range\] and clinically relevant bleeding risk including cirrhotic patients with Child Pugh B and C), and other major medical conditions that, in the opinion of the site investigator, might influence efficacy or safety assessment
- •Current drug or alcohol use or dependency that would interfere with adherence to study procedures
- •Participation in another interventional study
- •Spasticity:
- •Major spasticity as indicated by the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale \>2/4 in either elbow flexors, wrist flexors or finger flexors of the affected limb
Arms & Interventions
Verum
Intervention: Cerebrolysin
Verum
Intervention: non-invasive brain stimulation
Control
Intervention: Placebo
Control
Intervention: sham intervention
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: Day 21
The ARAT assesses upper limb functioning. The ARAT consists of 19 items grouped into four subscales: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. The total score on the ARAT ranges from 0 to 57, with the lowest score indicating that no movements can be performed, and the upper score indicating normal performance.
Secondary Outcomes
- Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT)(Day 21)
- Hand grip dynamometry(Day 21)
- National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)(Day 21)