MedPath

Ambulance Crews' Experiences of Using a Mechanical Chest Compression Device.

Completed
Conditions
Resuscitation
Interventions
Other: Focus group discussion
Registration Number
NCT04478786
Lead Sponsor
Northumbria University
Brief Summary

Should a person have a cardiac arrest (where their heart stops beating) they require treatment of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This includes providing chest compressions. Traditionally these compressions are provided by hand but mechanical chest compression devices (MCCD) have been investigated for use in out of hospital resuscitation attempts.

Research trials recruiting human participants have concluded recently. They all found no difference in survival outcomes when MCCD and manual compressions were compared.

Despite this, the latest expert review on MCCD suggests that MCCD can be a reasonable alternative to high quality manual compressions when these cannot be provided. MCCD continue to be used by Specialists in the local ambulance service and historically by those recruiting patients to a national multi centre trial of MCCD. There is another, as yet under-investigated element, and that is of ambulance crews' experiences of using such devices. Therefore it is a reasonable topic to investigate.

Detailed Description

This study will invite local United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) operational ambulance crews to participate in a 1-2 hour online focus group discussion (a collective group discussion) about their experiences of using MCCD. The participants will be any operational ambulance crew member, employed by the local ambulance Trust and who had experience of using any type of MCCD. The focus groups will be audio recorded; participants will be aware of this when they choose to participate.

The aim of this research is to collect and report ambulance crews' experiences of using mechanical chest compression devices for out of hospital resuscitation attempts.

Ultimately there may of course be benefits for patients by exploring whether MCCD play a part in out of hospital resuscitations. Funding has been offered by a manufacturer one of the types of MCCD; they have had no involvement in the design or analysis of the study.

Once transcribed, the data will be analysed manually. The content of each focus group will be coded and then each participants' individual responses will be coded, first using open coding, then focused coding to identify emergent themes, before concluding with the categories that have been identified. The constant comparison method of data analysis will be used.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
15
Inclusion Criteria
  • aged 18 or over
  • an employee of the local ambulance service
  • employed as an operational ambulance crew member, irrespective of title
  • to have experienced an out of hospital resuscitation where MCCD was used, irrespective of the type of device or their level of involvement.
Exclusion Criteria
  • not an employee of the local ambulance service
  • have no experience of using a mechanical chest compression device at an out of hospital resuscitation
  • the participant is unwilling to provide consent to participate
  • the participant is unwilling to provide consent to be audio recorded.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Focus Groups 1-4Focus group discussionAn anticipated 3-8 participants who meet the inclusion criteria of being aged 18 or over, a employee of the local ambulance service, are employed as an operational ambulance crew member, irrespective of title and to have had experienced an out of hospital resuscitation where MCCD was used, irrespective of the type of device or their level of involvement, and who also volunteer and agree to take part in the online focus group.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Collect and report ambulance crews' experiences of using MCCDs for out-of-hospital resuscitation attempts.2 hours

The transcribed discussions will be coded and then themes emerging from the data identified and developed. To do this I will use a constant comparison method of analysis. The presence or lack of consensus and reinforcement on certain topics will also be observed for.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust

🇬🇧

Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath