Evaluation of the Efficiency of Intermittent Enteral Nutrition on Multi-organ Failure From Patients With Mechanical Ventilation in Intensive Care Unit
- Conditions
- Septic ShockIntermittent FastingOrgan Failure, Multiple
- Interventions
- Other: Intermittent enteral nutrition
- Registration Number
- NCT06330610
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Rouen
- Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of intermittent enteral nutrition versus continuous enteral nutrition to prevent from organ failures for patients at the acute phase of sepsis shock with mechanical ventilation in ICU.
- Detailed Description
Some pre-clinical and observational studies have suggested that intermittent fasting may have a positive impact on patients in ICU by increasing protein synthesis, sensibility to insulin, cetogenesis, autophagy by respecting the circadian rhythm. This study aims to evaluate the impact on organ failures of an intermittent enteral nutrition versus continuous enteral nutrition in patients at the acute phase of sepsis shock with mechanical ventilation in the ICU.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 174
- Patient admitted in ICU for less than 48h, with invasive mechanical ventilation predicted for at least 48h, that can undergo nasogastric feeding.
- Patient under vasopressive drugs
- Patient that signed collected
- Patient under healthcare system
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Affiliation to a social security scheme
- Patient who has read and understood the information letter and signed the consent form
- Oesophageal varices or occlusive syndrom
- Impossibility to start enteral feeding within 48h after admission in the ICU
- Enteral nutrition started for more than one hour
- Parenteral nutrition
- Pregnant or parturient or breastfeeding woman or proven absence of contraception
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intermittent enteral nutrition Intermittent enteral nutrition patients that receive intermittent enteral nutrition.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evolution of variation of the SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score. day-1 (nutrition start) and day-7 Comparison of variation of the SOFA score between patients with intermittent nutrition versus patients with continuous nutrition.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evaluation of the metabolic response day 1, day 4 and day 7 metabolomics analysis (96 proteins assay)
Evaluation of the intensive care neuromuscular weakness Up to day 10 MRC score
evaluation of caloric intake from day-1 (nutrition start) to day-7 evaluation of caloric intake (kcal/day)
Evaluation of the digestive symptoms from day-1 (nutrition start) to day-7 Number of vomit (number)
Evaluation of the nosocomial infections from day-1 (nutrition start) to day-7 Type of infection
Evaluation of death from day 1 to day 90 Death data collection
Evaluation of quality of life up to day 90 SF-36 score
evaluation of protein intake from day-1 (nutrition start) to day-7 evaluation of protein intake (g/kg/day)
Measurement of nutritionnal status day-1 (nutrition start) and day-7 measurement of weight (kg)
Evaluation of the duration of hospitalisation day 1 to day 90 number of days at hospital