Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05629819
NCT05629819UnknownNot Applicable

Effect of Early Non-invasive Phrenic Nerve Stimulation on Weaning in Mechanically Ventilated Patients:A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study

Bing Sun1 site in 1 country104 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
104
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Ventilator-free days

Study Overview

Brief Summary

the early application of non-invasive PNS in MV patients can increase the number of days without mechanical ventilation, delay disuse phrenic atrophy, and improve the strength of inspiratory muscle.

Detailed Description

A prospective randomized controlled study included 104 patients with MV who met inclusion criteria in multiple hospital ICU units and were randomly divided 1:1 into PNS and conventional groups. The PNS group received neuromuscular electrical stimulation in addition to routine airway management, early activity and respiratory muscle training. It was verified that early non-invasive PNS could increase the number of days without mechanical ventilation for 28 days, delay disused diaphragm atrophy and improve inspiratory muscle strength.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

Patients enrolled in the study were unaware of the study

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age ≥18years and ≤80years;
  • •MV time ≤48h;
  • •MV duration is expected to be ≥72h;
  • •The sternocleidomastoid region and pectoralis major region were completely exposed.
  • •Patients or family members are willing to sign informed consent and participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •There are contraindications to PNS in vitro (Pneumothorax, active tuberculosis, pleural adhesions, installation of pacemakers and defibrillators, etc.);
  • •Neuromuscular disease (myasthenia gravis, etc.) or known anatomical abnormalities of the diaphragm;
  • •ECMO status;
  • •Hemodynamic instability;
  • •Uncorrected arrhythmias;
  • •Be pregnant;
  • •Clinical end-stage and palliative care patients.

Arms & Interventions

conventional group

No Intervention
  • conventional respiratory therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation, including airway management, early activity, and respiratory muscle training.
  • No intervention

PNS group

Experimental

In addition to conventional respiratory therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation, neuromuscular electrical stimulator was used for PNS

  • Device Settings Strength: Maximum current tolerated by the patient (0-100mA, commonly used below 13mA) ; Stimulation time: 1.0s; Frequency: 40Hz;
  • Location: The stimulation electrodes were attached to the left and right sides of the neck under the outer margin of the sternocleidomastoid muscle 1/3; The reference electrodes were attached to the surface of both pectoralis major muscles.
  • Treatment frequency: 30 at a time, Bid, until withdrawal/death/for 4 weeks.

Intervention: Non-invasive phrenic nerve stimulation (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Ventilator-free days

Time Frame: 28 days

Secondary Outcomes

  • Transdiaphragmatic Pressure(up to 28 days)
  • re-intubation rate(28 days)
  • ICU mortality(28 days)
  • diaphragm thickening fraction(up to 28 days)
  • Diaphragm thickness(up to 28 days)
  • mechanical ventilation days(28 days)
  • Maximal Inspiratory Pressure(up to 28 days)
  • 60/90-day survival rate(28 days)

Investigators

Sponsor
Bing Sun
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Bing Sun

professor of treatment

Beijing Chao Yang Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials