A comparison of two medical airway devices (auragain and igel in patients who will undergo laparoscopic surgery
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/03/041043
- Lead Sponsor
- arayana Medical College and Hospitals
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patient with normal investigations and posted for elective laparoscopic Hysterectomy,Cystectomy,Tubectomy
ASA Grade 1 and 2
Mallampati Score 1 AND 2
Anticipated duration of surgery <2 Hours
Exclusion Criteria
Patients without valid informed consent
Patients with predicted difficult airway
Patients with high risk of aspiration
Patients with respiratory tract pathology or serious bleeding disorder
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Insertion time <br/ ><br>Ease of insertion <br/ ><br>Insertion attempts <br/ ><br>Oropharyngeal leak pressure soon after insertion and 1 hr after insertion <br/ ><br>Blood staining on removal <br/ ><br>Postoperative sore throat <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1 minute <br/ ><br>5 minutes <br/ ><br>10 minutes after device insertion <br/ ><br>After removal <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method As a conduit for intubation <br/ ><br>Fiberoptic bronchoscopic grading of device placementTimepoint: 1 minute <br/ ><br>5 minutes <br/ ><br>1 hour