MedPath

Study of a Cilioscleral Interposition Device (CID) SV22 in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Glaucoma, Open-Angle
Interventions
Device: Interposition supraciliary implant
Registration Number
NCT05236439
Lead Sponsor
Ciliatech
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of implanting a new version of an interposition supraciliary implant (SV22) as a stand-alone therapy for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary narrow angle glaucoma (PNAG) who have failed at least one class of topical medical therapy

Detailed Description

57 patients will be included in this 36 months interventional study.

All patients shall be indicated for glaucoma surgery alone (not combined with cataract), and will undergo incisional glaucoma therapy, including a simplified surgical technique allowing the placement of an interposition supraciliary permanent device.

Several patient data like safety events, IOP, visual capacity or associated pharmacological treatments will be recorded pre and post-operatively all along the follow-up.

Purpose is to ensure device safety, and verify IOP and associated pharmacological treatment reduction after surgery, and evolution along follow-up.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
57
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of Primary Glaucome Schafer 1 to 4
  • Medicated IOP ≥ 21
  • naive of any glaucoma surgery
Exclusion Criteria
  • Inflammatory, congenital, traumatic, neovascular, ICE syndrome, angle closure and Schaffer 1 and 2 glaucoma

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Interposition supraciliary implantInterposition supraciliary implantAny patients corresponding to inclusion / exclusion criteria
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assess post-op IOP reduction6 months

Proportion of eyes with \>= 20% decrease in mean-Diurnal-IOP from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Compare efficacy outcomes between POAG and PNAG sub-groups6 months

Absolute differences in IOP

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Malayan center

🇦🇲

Yerevan, Armenia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath