Evaluating Procedures for a Study of the AYA Survivors Coping and Emotional Needs Toolkit

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Adolescent; Cancer; Young Adult; Adult; Depression

• Registration Number: NCT06420193
• Lead Sponsor: East Carolina University

Brief Summary

The investigators developed a digital intervention that aims to help adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (AYAs) manage symptoms of depression. This tool includes daily mood tracking, a psychoeducational module about cancer and depression, four components that are based on evidence-based interventions for depression. The goal of this study is to evaluate the acceptability of procedures for a future trial in which the investigators will test which component or combination of components meaningfully contribute to improvements in depressive symptoms among AYAs. Additionally, the investigators will evaluate study feasibility as well as intervention acceptability, satisfaction, usability, and engagement.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2024-05-07
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-05-16
• Study First Posted: 2024-05-17
• Study Start: 2024-10-01
• Primary Completion: 2025-06-17
• Study Completion: 2025-06-17
• Status Verified: 2025-07
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-07-05
• Last Update Posted: 2025-07-10

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 16

Inclusion Criteria

• Age at enrollment (adolescents 15-17, emerging adults 18-25, young adults 26-39)
• Age at diagnosis (adolescents 12-17, emerging adults 15-25, young adults 15-39)
• Time since completion of treatment: 1 month to 5 years
• Language: Fluent in English (spoken and written)
• Technology: Own smart phone with data plan

Exclusion Criteria

• Mental Health: Current diagnosis of severe or persistent mental illness
• Suicidality: Severe suicidal ideation (including plan and intent)

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: FACTORIAL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Acceptability of Study Procedures - Quantitative	Week 6	An investigator-developed survey will be used to evaluate acceptability of study procedures. Mean scale scores range from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability. Descriptive statistics and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be calculated.
Acceptability of Study Procedures - Qualitative	Weeks 6-8	An investigator-developed semi-structured interview will be used to evaluate acceptability of study procedures. Transcriptions of semi-structured interviews will undergo rapid qualitative analysis to characterize the reasons for sub-optimal acceptability of study procedures.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Study Feasibility - Recruitment Rate	Upon enrollment of 16 participants	Recruitment rate will be calculated as the number of participants enrolled in the study divided by the number of participants contacted.
Intervention Acceptability & Satisfaction - Qualitative	Weeks 6-8	A semi-structured interview will be used to further characterize acceptability of and satisfaction with the intervention. Transcriptions of semi-structured interviews will undergo rapid qualitative analysis to characterize the reasons for sub-optimal acceptability of and satisfaction with the intervention.
eHealth Engagement Scale	Week 6	The eHealth Engagement Scale will be administered to evaluate how engaging users found ASCENT engagement. Mean scale scores range from 1 to 4, with lower scores indicating greater engagement. Descriptive statistics and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be calculated.
Intervention Adherence	Weeks 1-6	Adherence will be calculated as the percentage of pages viewed by the participant within a module divided by the total number of pages in the module as indicated by metrics from the website. Mean adherence rate and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each intervention module will be calculated.
Study Feasibility - Retention Rate	Week 6	Retention will be defined as the proportion of patients who provide T1 (6 week) data. Patients who discontinue the intervention (refuse phone calls) but complete the outcome assessments will be counted in the numerator for calculating retention.
Intervention Satisfaction - Quantitative	Week 6	An investigator-developed survey will be used to evaluate satisfaction with the intervention. Mean scale scores range from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. Descriptive statistics and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be calculated.
System Usability Scale	Week 6	The System Usability Scale (SUS) will be administered to evaluate perceived usability of ASCENT. SUS scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater usability. Descriptive statistics and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be calculated.
Intervention Acceptability - Quantitative	Week 6	An investigator-developed survey will be used to evaluate acceptability of the intervention.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

East Carolina University; 🇺🇸 Greenville, North Carolina, United States