Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00847444
NCT00847444UnknownPhase 3

Simultaneous Study of Docetaxel Based Anthracycline Free Adjuvant Treatment Evaluation, as Well as Life Style Intervention Strategies

Philip Hepp1 site in 1 country3,547 target enrollmentStarted: February 2009Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
Enrollment
3,547
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The first primary objective of this study is to compare disease free survival after randomisation in patients treated with a combination of 5-FU/Epirubicine/Cyclophosphamide followed by Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This is an open-label, multicenter, 2x2 factorial design, randomized controlled, Phase III study comparing the disease free survival after randomisation in patients treated with 3 cycles of Epirubicine-Fluorouracil-Cyclophosphamide(FEC)-chemotherapy, followed by 3 cycles of Docetaxel(D)-chemotherapy, versus 6 cycles of Docetaxel- Cyclophosphamide (DC)-chemotherapy, and to compare the disease free survival in patients with BMI of 24 - 40 kg/m² after randomisation with versus without the lifestyle intervention. Patients will be required to have histopathological proof of a HER2/neu negative tumor and: axillary lymph node metastases (pN1-3) or high risk node negative, defined as: 'pT ≥2 or histopathological grade 3, or age ≤35 or negative hormone receptor status, but are not allowed to have evidence of distant disease. Patients will have to be entered into the study no later than 6 weeks after complete resection of the primary tumor. No other antineoplastic treatment other than surgical treatment, the defined cytotoxic and endocrine treatment and radiotherapy will be allowed prior to study entry and during the course of the study.

Detailed Description

Rationale:

  • Taxane based chemotherapy will be established as treatment standard in the adjuvant setting of early breast cancer
  • 3xFEC100, followed by 3xDoc100 has been established as standard treatment option for node-positive breast cancer
  • Anthracycline based regimens do not seem to be superior in Her2/neu-negative patients (Gennari et al., Slamon et al.)
  • Dietary intervention can improve outcome in patients with early breast cancer (WINS, Chlebowski et al.)

Primary Endpoints:

  • The first primary objective of this study is to compare disease free survival after randomisation in patients treated with a combination of 5-FU/Epirubicine/Cyclophosphamide followed by Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide
  • The second primary objective of this study is to compare disease free survival after randomisation in patients with vs. without lifestyle intervention

Design:

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

AA

Active Comparator

Drug intervention

Intervention: Drug-based intervention (Drug)

BA

Active Comparator

Lifestyle intervention

Intervention: Lifestyle-based Intervention (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The first primary objective of this study is to compare disease free survival after randomisation in patients treated with a combination of 5-FU/Epirubicine/Cyclophosphamide followed by Docetaxel vs. Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide

Time Frame: 60 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • The second primary objective of this study is to compare disease free survival after randomisation in patients with vs. without lifestyle intervention(60 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Philip Hepp
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Philip Hepp

Sponsors Representant

Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials