跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06641804
NCT06641804尚未招募不适用

Effect of Materials of Vaginal Ring Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse on the Effects of Complications and Patient's Satisfaction

Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong0 个研究点目标入组 140 人开始时间: 2024年10月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
140
主要终点
Pessary related complications

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the effect of vaginal ring pessary material on pessary complications and patients' satisfaction.

Participants who are using PVC (polyvinyl chloride) pessary will be randomized to

  1. PVC vaginal ring pessary
  2. Silicon vaginal ring pessary

Their pessary-related complications, patients' satisfaction, pain during pessary exchange and prolapse related symptoms with reference to PFDI-20 score will be assessed in a period of six months.

详细描述

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common gynaecological condition which attains prevalence of 15% women. It causes negative impact on physical, emotional and psychosexual aspects, thus significantly impairs patients' activities of daily living and quality of life. Treatment modalities include conservative, pessary and surgical management. Vaginal pessary is inexpensive, non-invasive and an attractive treatment option for women who possess high anaesthetic and surgical risks. Pessary-related complications include vaginal ulcer, vaginitis which would require temporary discontinuation of pessary use in order to prevent serious complications such as incarceration and fistula formation. If complications can be minimised, it is more likely that patients' satisfaction can further improve.

Vaginal pessaries are primarily made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or silicone. PVC has been the material of choice for local practice based on its long history in clinical use and cheaper cost. A new PVC pessary is inserted at each consultation if vaginal condition is satisfactory. In view of the increasing number of POP patients who opt for long term pessary use, silicone has emerged as alternative material of choice in recent years. Despite being more expensive, silicone pessaries can be washed and re-inserted for 20 washes/10 years if remained intact and not visibly damaged. As silicone pessary is more pliable, it can facilitate the process of pessary insertion and removal by squeezing of the pessary to pass through narrow introitus. On the other hand, it may be more easily compressed by abdominal pressure and dislodged when straining. The UK clinical guideline for best practice in the use of vaginal pessaries for POP in 2021 suggested there is no clear preference of offering one type of pessary over another, further supported by the latest publication of a multi-centre pessary study in the UK in 2023.

The primary objective is to determine the effect of vaginal ring pessary material on pessary complications and patients' satisfaction. The secondary objectives are to explore the effect of pessary material on procedural pain during pessary exchange as well as prolapse-related symptoms. It is hypothesised that silicone pessaries, compared to PVC pessaries, can reduce the rate of pessary-related complications from 30% to 10% and also result in higher patients' satisfaction.

This is a single-blinded, randomised placebo-controlled trial conducted in the pessary clinic in Princess Margaret Hospital

Participants are assessed for eligibility when they present to pessary clinic for routine pessary care.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • At least 18 years old who understand written traditional Chinese
  • Diagnosed with stage 1-4 POP according to the standard of Pelvic organ prolapse Quantification (POP-Q)
  • Using PVC pessary as long term management for POP
  • Willing to participate and provide a written informed consent.

排除标准

  • Do not understand or comprehend written traditional Chinese
  • Cannot provide written consent
  • Vaginal complication requiring discontinuation of pessary use
  • Unable to follow up clinic 6 months later
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Recruited in other research studies

结局指标

主要结局

Pessary related complications

时间窗: 6 months

Patient reported symptoms such as vaginal bleeding, vaginal discharge, pessary dislodgement Physician reported complications such as ulcers formation, vaginitis

Patient satisfaction

时间窗: 6 months

Visual analogue score 1- 10 \[Minimal satisfaction: 1, Maximal satisfaction: 10\]

次要结局

  • Pain during pessary exchange(6 months)
  • Prolapse related symptoms(6 months)

研究者

发起方
Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong
申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Lo Cheuk Yin

Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong

相似试验