Efficacy of Acupuncture for Discogenic Sciatica

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Sciatica

• Registration Number: NCT02770963
• Lead Sponsor: Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Brief Summary

This trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture on pain relief for patients with discogenic sciatica compared with sham acupuncture.

Detailed Description

Background: Sciatica is primarily caused by herniated discs with nerve-root compression. Acupuncture may effectively relieve the pain of discogenic sciatica, but the evidence is limited.

Methods/Design: Sixty patients with discogenic sciatica will be recruited and randomized to receive acupuncture or sham-acupuncture at a 1:1 ratio. Patients in both groups will receive treatment 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The following acupoints will be used: Dachang shu (BL 25), Shenshu (BL 23), Weizhong (BL 40), and Chengshan (BL 57).

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2016-05
• Study Start: 2016-05
• Study First Submitted: 2016-05-05
• Study First Submitted QC: 2016-05-11
• Last Update Submitted: 2016-05-11
• Study First Posted: 2016-05-12
• Last Update Posted: 2016-05-12
• Primary Completion: 2017-12
• Study Completion: 2018-06

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

1. Unilateral leg pain diagnosed as discogenic sciatica;
2. Sciatica patients with an average leg pain VAS of 40 mm or higher in the last 24 hours;
3. Aged 18 to 75 years;
4. Leg pains that correlate with CT or MRI findings of lumbar disc herniation;
5. Patients who agree to follow the trial protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Severe cases with central or giant or ruptured lumbar disc herniation, cauda equina syndrome, foot drop, or surgery requirements;
2. Progressive neurological symptoms after 3 months of strict conservative treatment (e.g., nerve root adhesion, crossed straight-leg testing, or obvious muscle atrophy);
3. Severe cardiovascular, liver, kidney, hematopoietic system diseases, autoimmune diseases, or poor nutritional status;
4. Subjects with cognitive impairment;
5. Pregnancy;
6. Subjects who received acupuncture for sciatica within the past month.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
change from baseline in mean weekly VAS of leg pain	Baseline, weeks 1-4, week 16 and week 28	VAS uses a 100-mm line that is labeled at each end, and 0 mm represents no pain, and 100 mm represents unbearable pain. Patients will rate the VAS (average VAS of leg pain in the past 24 hours), and a researcher will record the VAS once weekly, generally at the third weekly treatment. The mean weekly VAS of leg pain over weeks 1-4 will be calculated as the sum VAS of each week divided by the number of weeks assessed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in mean weekly VAS of low back pain	Baseline, weeks 1-4, week 16 and week 28	Patients will rate their average low back pain intensity in the past 24 hours using VAS. The mean weekly VAS of low back pain over weeks 1-4 will be calculated as described above for the mean weekly VAS of leg pain over weeks 1-4.
Oswestry disability index	Baseline, week 4, week 16 and week 28	ODI consists of 10 questions, including pain intensity, lifting, ability to care for oneself, ability to walk, ability to sit, sexual function, ability to stand, social life, sleep quality, and ability to travel. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-5. The scores for all questions answered are summed and divided by the highest possible score to obtain the index (range 0% to 100%). 0% equals no disability, and 100% is the maximum disability possible
Patients' global impressions of improvement	week 4	Patients' global impressions of improvement measured using a Likert 7-point scale (higher scores indicate worse outcome).
Patients' expectations for acupuncture	baseline	This questionnaire includes three brief questions to investigate whether patients believe that acupuncture treatment will help their sciatica. The relationship between patients' expectations and the effectiveness of acupuncture will be investigated because patients' beliefs about treatment enhanced or attenuated the effectiveness of treatment in a previous experimental study .
Blinded evaluation	week 4	Blinded evaluation as measured by patient questioning of whether they believed they received real acupuncture at week 4. The difference in the proportion of patients who believed that they received real acupuncture between the two groups will be analyzed.
Incidence of serious adverse events	up to 28 weeks	The investigators will record and evaluate all adverse events .

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences; 🇨🇳 Beijing, China