Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04316793
NCT04316793CompletedNot Applicable

Neurophysiological, Biomechanical and Clinical Effects of Dry Needling Versus Sham Needling When Applied to the Infraspinatus Muscle in People With Chronic Shoulder Pain: a Randomized Pilot Study

Université de Sherbrooke1 site in 1 country21 target enrollmentStarted: March 3, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
21
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Exclusion rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Up to 77% of patients with chronic shoulder pain have a trigger point (TrP) in the infraspinatus muscle. These TrPs can lead to pain, limitation of activities and reduced quality of life. Dry needling (DN) is gaining popularity as a treatment for TrPs in physiotherapy. However, its clinical effects remain poorly understood mechanistically and its neurophysiological effects little studied.

The primary objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of a larger scale study.

The secondary objective of this study is to to explore the immediate neurophysiological, biomechanical and clinical effects of DN and sham needling when applied to TrP of the infraspinatus muscle in people with chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain.

Detailed Description

Methodology

In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial, twenty adults with chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain and with a infraspinatus TrP will be recruited according to established criteria. Participants will be randomized into two groups: one group (n = 10) receiving a DN in the infraspinatus TrP and another group (n = 10) receiving a sham needling.

Recruitment strategies

Recruitment will be done through posters that will be posted on bulletin boards of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences of the University of Sherbrooke and in physiotherapy clinics in the region. The persons interested will be invited to contact the research assistant in charge of the study to verify their eligibility to participate.

Data collection procedure

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Unilateral, chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain (VAS ≥ 2/10; >3 months)
  • Localized pain in the shoulder region or referred according to the territory of the infraspinatus (Travell and Simons, 1999)
  • Presence of a palpable nodule inside a tight muscle band reproducing the patient's pain

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cancer or metastasis in organs or tissues above the pelvis (< 5 years)
  • Shoulder capsulitis
  • Shoulder, thorax or mastectomy surgeries
  • Shoulder bone fracture (< 6 months)
  • C4-C5 or C6 radiculopathy
  • Osteoporosis or excessive atrophy of the infraspinous fossa (infraspinatus <10 mm)
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 28
  • Exclusion (TMS security):
  • Pregnant woman
  • Neurological, psychiatric or epilepsy conditions
  • Implants (e.g. Neurostimulator, pacemaker, cerebral aneurysm clip, screw or plate), metallic foreign body in the eye
  • Head trauma with loss of consciousness

Arms & Interventions

Dry needling (DN)

Experimental

Intramuscular insertion

Intervention: Dry needling (Other)

Sham needling (SN)

Sham Comparator

Intradermal insertion

Intervention: Sham needling (SN) (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Exclusion rate

Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 months

Number of participants excluded from the study due to eligibility criteria (e.g. too narrow, are they clear)

Recruitment rate

Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 months

Average number of participants recruited per month

Refusal rate

Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 10 months

Number of participants who refused to participate (e.g. fear of needle, fear of transcranial magnetic stimulation)

Retention rate

Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after and 24 hours post-treatment evaluation

Number of loss at follow-up

Length of time of the procedure

Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after and 24 hours post-treatment evaluation

Average time needed per participant (testing and intervention)

Safety of the procedure: adverse effects

Time Frame: Immediately after intervention to 24 hours post-treatment

Listing of any adverse effects

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pressure pain perceived(At baseline, immediately after intervention, 24 hours after the intervention)
  • Corticospinal excitability of the infraspinatus(At baseline, immediately after intervention, 24 hours after the intervention)
  • Glenohumeral arthrokinematics(At baseline, immediately after intervention, 24 hours after the intervention)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Nathaly Gaudreault

Full Professor

Université de Sherbrooke

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials