MedPath

Efficacy Assessment of Insulin Glargine Versus LiraglutidE After Oral Agents Failure

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01117350
Lead Sponsor
Sanofi
Brief Summary

Primary objective:

To demonstrate the superiority of insulin glargine over liraglutide in terms of percentage of patients reaching a Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) \< 7% at the end of the comparative period (24 weeks) in Type 2 diabetic patients failing lifestyle management and oral agents

Secondary objectives of the comparative period (24 weeks):

\>To assess the effect of insulin glargine in comparison with liraglutide on:

* HbA1c level

* Percentage of patients whose HbA1c has decreased but remains \>= 7% at the end of the comparative period

* Percentage of patients whose HbA1c has increased at the end of the comparative period

* Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

* 7-point Plasma Glucose (PG) profiles

* Hypoglycemia occurrence

* Body weight

* Adverse events

Objectives of the extension period (24 weeks):

\>To assess the effect of insulin glargine in patients not adequately controlled with liraglutide on:

* HbA1c level

* FPG

* 7-point PG profiles

* Hypoglycemia occurrence

* Body weight

* Adverse events

Detailed Description

Maximum estimated study duration per patient: either 27 weeks (patients randomized to insulin glargine arm) or 51 weeks (patients randomized to liraglutide arm) broken down as follow:

* A 2-week of screening period,

* A 24-week comparative period,

* A 24-week extension period (only for patients treated with liraglutide, not adequately controlled at the end of the comparative period),

* A 1-week follow-up period

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
978
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
LiraglutideLiraglutideLiraglutide administered once a day, in the morning or in the evening, at the most convenient time. The time of injection , once chosen was to remain unchanged during the whole duration of the study. The dose was 0.6 mg/day during the first week, 1.2 mg/day during the second week and 1.8 mg/day until week 24. The dose might be decreased to 1.2 mg for safety reasons (e.g. gastro-intestinal tolerability), based on Investigator's judgment.
Insulin GlargineInsulin glargineInsulin glargine administered once a day, in the morning or in the evening, at the most convenient time. The time of injection, once chosen was to remain unchanged during the whole duration of the study. The starting dose was 0.2 Unit per kilogram of body weight or 10 Units. Patients were empowered to adjust their insulin doses, under strict investigator's supervision. Insulin titration (by 2 or 4 Units) was done every 3 days according to the median value of Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) of the last 3 days. The goal was to achieve 70 \< FPG ≤ 100 mg/dL (3.9 \< FPG ≤ 5.5 mmol/L). Minor deviations from the titration scheme could be allowed, based on Investigator's judgment and patient's situation.
Insulin GlargineMetforminInsulin glargine administered once a day, in the morning or in the evening, at the most convenient time. The time of injection, once chosen was to remain unchanged during the whole duration of the study. The starting dose was 0.2 Unit per kilogram of body weight or 10 Units. Patients were empowered to adjust their insulin doses, under strict investigator's supervision. Insulin titration (by 2 or 4 Units) was done every 3 days according to the median value of Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) of the last 3 days. The goal was to achieve 70 \< FPG ≤ 100 mg/dL (3.9 \< FPG ≤ 5.5 mmol/L). Minor deviations from the titration scheme could be allowed, based on Investigator's judgment and patient's situation.
LiraglutideMetforminLiraglutide administered once a day, in the morning or in the evening, at the most convenient time. The time of injection , once chosen was to remain unchanged during the whole duration of the study. The dose was 0.6 mg/day during the first week, 1.2 mg/day during the second week and 1.8 mg/day until week 24. The dose might be decreased to 1.2 mg for safety reasons (e.g. gastro-intestinal tolerability), based on Investigator's judgment.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Patients Whose Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) <7% at the End of the Comparative Periodweek 12, week 24

The value at the end of the comparative period was defined as the last available HbA1c value measured during the comparative period plus 14 days after the last dose of Investigational Product (i.e. last-observation-carried-forward \[LOCF\] value).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Daily Dose of Insulin Glargineweek 1, week 2, week 6, week 12, week 24
Percentage of Patients Whose Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Has Decreased But Remains ≥7% at the End of the Comparative Periodbaseline (week -2), week 12, week 24

Percentage of patients with:

\* HbA1c value at end of the comparative period (LOCF) lower than HbA1c baseline value

AND

\* HbA1c value at end of the comparative period (LOCF) ≥7%

Percentage of Patients Whose Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Has Increased at the End of the Comparative Periodbaseline (week -2), week 12, week 24

Percentage of patients with HbA1c value at end of the comparative period (LOCF) higher than HbA1c baseline value

Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c): Change From Baseline to the End of Comparative Periodbaseline (week -2), week 12, week 24

Change in HbA1C from baseline to the last observation carried forward (LOCF) measured during the comparative period = LOCF value - baseline value

Percentage of Patients Whose Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) <7% at the End of the Extension Periodweek 36, week 48

Value at the end of the extension period defined as last available HbA1c value measured during the extension period (i.e. last observation carried forward (LOCF) value)

Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c): Change From Beginning to the End of the Extension Periodweek 24, week 36, week 48

Change in HbA1C from beginning of the extension period (week 24) to the last observation carried forward (LOCF) measured during the extension period = LOCF value - week 24 value

Self-Monitored Fasting Plasma Glucose (SMFPG) Measurements: Change From Baseline to the End of the Comparative Periodbaseline (week 0), week 6, week 12, week 18, week 24

SMFPG = mean value of Self-Monitored Fasting Plasma Glucose measurements over 3 consecutive days in the week before each visit

Value at the end of the comparative period defined as last available value during the comparative period (i.e. last-observation-carried-forward \[LOCF\] value)

Change = LOCF value - baseline value

Self-Monitored Fasting Plasma Glucose (SMFPG) Measurements: Change From Beginning to the End of the Extension Periodweek 24, week 30, week 36, week 48

SMFPG = mean value of Self-Monitored Fasting Plasma Glucose measurements over 3 consecutive days in the week before each visit

Value at the end of the extension period defined as last available value during the extension period (i.e. last-observation-carried-forward \[LOCF\] value)

Change = LOCF value - week 24 value

Self-Monitored 7-point Plasma Glucose (PG) Profile: Change From Baseline to the End of the Comparative Periodbaseline (week 0), week 12, week 24

Self-monitored 7-point plasma glucose profiles (before and 2 hours after the start of breakfast, lunch and dinner, and at bedtime) recorded on 3 consecutive days in the week before each visit

Value at the end of the comparative period defined as last available value during the comparative period (i.e. last-observation-carried-forward \[LOCF\] value)

Change = LOCF value - baseline value

Self-Monitored 7-point Plasma Glucose (PG) Profile: Change From Beginning to the End of the Extension Periodweek 24, week 36, week 48

Self-monitored 7-point plasma glucose profiles (before and 2 hours after the start of breakfast, lunch and dinner, and at bedtime) recorded on 3 consecutive days in the week before each visit

Value at the end of the extension period defined as last available value during the extension period (i.e. last-observation-carried-forward \[LOCF\] value)

Change = LOCF value - week 24 value

Body Weight: Change From Baseline to the End of the Comparative Periodbaseline (week 0), week 2, week 6, week 12, week 18, week 24

Change = Last weight value measured during the comparative period (LOCF value) - weight value at baseline

Body Weight: Change From Beginning to End of the Extension Periodweek 24, week 30, week 36, week 48

Change = Last weight value measured during the extension period (LOCF value) - weight value at beginning of the Extension Period (Week 24)

Daily Dose of Liraglutideweek 1, week 2, week 6, week 12, week 24
Daily Dose of Insulin Glargine Administered During the Extension Periodweek 30, week 36, week 48
Hypoglycemia Occurence: Number of Patients With at Least One Episode of Symptomatic / Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During the Comparative Periodall across the comparative period (from week 0 to week 24)

Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from hypoglycemia.

Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from hypoglycemia, requiring the assistance of another person for active administration of carbohydrate, glucagon or other countermeasure because the patient could not treat him/herself due to acute neurological impairment directly resulting from the hypoglycemia (assistance by another person when the patient could have treated him/herself was not considered as requiring assistance)and one of the following criteria:

* The event was associated with a measured PG level \< 36 mg/dL (2 mmol/L),

* Or, in absence of PG value, the event was associated with neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of PG to normal, after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose or glucagon administration.

Hypoglycemia Occurence: Number of Patients With at Least One Episode of Symptomatic / Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During the Extension Periodall across the extension period (from week 24 to week 48)

Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from hypoglycemia.

Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from hypoglycemia, requiring the assistance of another person for active administration of carbohydrate, glucagon or other countermeasure because the patient could not treat him/herself due to acute neurological impairment directly resulting from the hypoglycemia (assistance by another person when the patient could have treated him/herself was not considered as requiring assistance)and one of the following criteria:

* The event was associated with a measured PG level \< 36 mg/dL (2 mmol/L),

* Or, in absence of PG value, the event was associated with neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of PG to normal, after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose or glucagon administration.

Trial Locations

Locations (136)

Investigational Site Number 840023

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Investigational Site Number 840002

🇺🇸

Goodyear, Arizona, United States

Investigational Site Number 840047

🇺🇸

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Investigational Site Number 840017

🇺🇸

La Jolla, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840036

🇺🇸

La Mesa, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840037

🇺🇸

Loma Linda, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840045

🇺🇸

Long Beach, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840048

🇺🇸

Mission Hills, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840033

🇺🇸

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840019

🇺🇸

Palm Springs, California, United States

Scroll for more (126 remaining)
Investigational Site Number 840023
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.