Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01117350
NCT01117350
Completed
Phase 4

A 24-week, Multicenter, International, Randomized (1:1), Parallel-group, Open-label, Comparative Study of Insulin Glargine Versus Liraglutide in Insulin-naïve Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Oral Agents and Not Adequately Controlled, Followed by a 24-week Extension Period With Insulin Glargine for Patients Not Adequately Controlled With Liraglutide

Sanofi136 sites in 2 countries978 target enrollmentJuly 2010

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Insulin glargine
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Sponsor
Sanofi
Enrollment
978
Locations
136
Primary Endpoint
Percentage of Patients Whose Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) <7% at the End of the Comparative Period
Status
Completed
Last Updated
12 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Primary objective:

To demonstrate the superiority of insulin glargine over liraglutide in terms of percentage of patients reaching a Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) < 7% at the end of the comparative period (24 weeks) in Type 2 diabetic patients failing lifestyle management and oral agents

Secondary objectives of the comparative period (24 weeks):

>To assess the effect of insulin glargine in comparison with liraglutide on:

  • HbA1c level
  • Percentage of patients whose HbA1c has decreased but remains >= 7% at the end of the comparative period
  • Percentage of patients whose HbA1c has increased at the end of the comparative period
  • Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
  • 7-point Plasma Glucose (PG) profiles
  • Hypoglycemia occurrence
  • Body weight
  • Adverse events

Objectives of the extension period (24 weeks):

>To assess the effect of insulin glargine in patients not adequately controlled with liraglutide on:

  • HbA1c level
  • FPG
  • 7-point PG profiles
  • Hypoglycemia occurrence
  • Body weight
  • Adverse events

Detailed Description

Maximum estimated study duration per patient: either 27 weeks (patients randomized to insulin glargine arm) or 51 weeks (patients randomized to liraglutide arm) broken down as follow: * A 2-week of screening period, * A 24-week comparative period, * A 24-week extension period (only for patients treated with liraglutide, not adequately controlled at the end of the comparative period), * A 1-week follow-up period

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2010
End Date
March 2013
Last Updated
12 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Sanofi
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Insulin Glargine

Insulin glargine administered once a day, in the morning or in the evening, at the most convenient time. The time of injection, once chosen was to remain unchanged during the whole duration of the study. The starting dose was 0.2 Unit per kilogram of body weight or 10 Units. Patients were empowered to adjust their insulin doses, under strict investigator's supervision. Insulin titration (by 2 or 4 Units) was done every 3 days according to the median value of Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) of the last 3 days. The goal was to achieve 70 \< FPG ≤ 100 mg/dL (3.9 \< FPG ≤ 5.5 mmol/L). Minor deviations from the titration scheme could be allowed, based on Investigator's judgment and patient's situation.

Intervention: Insulin glargine

Insulin Glargine

Insulin glargine administered once a day, in the morning or in the evening, at the most convenient time. The time of injection, once chosen was to remain unchanged during the whole duration of the study. The starting dose was 0.2 Unit per kilogram of body weight or 10 Units. Patients were empowered to adjust their insulin doses, under strict investigator's supervision. Insulin titration (by 2 or 4 Units) was done every 3 days according to the median value of Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) of the last 3 days. The goal was to achieve 70 \< FPG ≤ 100 mg/dL (3.9 \< FPG ≤ 5.5 mmol/L). Minor deviations from the titration scheme could be allowed, based on Investigator's judgment and patient's situation.

Intervention: Metformin

Liraglutide

Liraglutide administered once a day, in the morning or in the evening, at the most convenient time. The time of injection , once chosen was to remain unchanged during the whole duration of the study. The dose was 0.6 mg/day during the first week, 1.2 mg/day during the second week and 1.8 mg/day until week 24. The dose might be decreased to 1.2 mg for safety reasons (e.g. gastro-intestinal tolerability), based on Investigator's judgment.

Intervention: Liraglutide

Liraglutide

Liraglutide administered once a day, in the morning or in the evening, at the most convenient time. The time of injection , once chosen was to remain unchanged during the whole duration of the study. The dose was 0.6 mg/day during the first week, 1.2 mg/day during the second week and 1.8 mg/day until week 24. The dose might be decreased to 1.2 mg for safety reasons (e.g. gastro-intestinal tolerability), based on Investigator's judgment.

Intervention: Metformin

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percentage of Patients Whose Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) <7% at the End of the Comparative Period

Time Frame: week 12, week 24

The value at the end of the comparative period was defined as the last available HbA1c value measured during the comparative period plus 14 days after the last dose of Investigational Product (i.e. last-observation-carried-forward \[LOCF\] value).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Daily Dose of Insulin Glargine(week 1, week 2, week 6, week 12, week 24)
  • Body Weight: Change From Beginning to End of the Extension Period(week 24, week 30, week 36, week 48)
  • Percentage of Patients Whose Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Has Decreased But Remains ≥7% at the End of the Comparative Period(baseline (week -2), week 12, week 24)
  • Percentage of Patients Whose Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Has Increased at the End of the Comparative Period(baseline (week -2), week 12, week 24)
  • Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c): Change From Baseline to the End of Comparative Period(baseline (week -2), week 12, week 24)
  • Percentage of Patients Whose Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) <7% at the End of the Extension Period(week 36, week 48)
  • Daily Dose of Liraglutide(week 1, week 2, week 6, week 12, week 24)
  • Daily Dose of Insulin Glargine Administered During the Extension Period(week 30, week 36, week 48)
  • Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c): Change From Beginning to the End of the Extension Period(week 24, week 36, week 48)
  • Self-Monitored Fasting Plasma Glucose (SMFPG) Measurements: Change From Baseline to the End of the Comparative Period(baseline (week 0), week 6, week 12, week 18, week 24)
  • Self-Monitored Fasting Plasma Glucose (SMFPG) Measurements: Change From Beginning to the End of the Extension Period(week 24, week 30, week 36, week 48)
  • Self-Monitored 7-point Plasma Glucose (PG) Profile: Change From Baseline to the End of the Comparative Period(baseline (week 0), week 12, week 24)
  • Self-Monitored 7-point Plasma Glucose (PG) Profile: Change From Beginning to the End of the Extension Period(week 24, week 36, week 48)
  • Body Weight: Change From Baseline to the End of the Comparative Period(baseline (week 0), week 2, week 6, week 12, week 18, week 24)
  • Hypoglycemia Occurence: Number of Patients With at Least One Episode of Symptomatic / Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During the Comparative Period(all across the comparative period (from week 0 to week 24))
  • Hypoglycemia Occurence: Number of Patients With at Least One Episode of Symptomatic / Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During the Extension Period(all across the extension period (from week 24 to week 48))

Study Sites (136)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials