Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02571348
NCT02571348UnknownNot Applicable

Optimum Micro-osteoperforations Accelerated Tooth Movement Interval, Related Pain Perception and Impact to Daily Functions - A Randomized Controlled Trial

University of Malaya1 site in 1 country36 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2015Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
36
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
rate of orthodontic tooth movement between micro osteoperforated site and non micro-osteoperforated site.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study is intended to investigate the optimum interval between micro-osteoperforations to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. Overall, the investigator will be comparing the rate of tooth movement between micro-osteoperforated site and non micro-osteoperforated site. Next, the investigator will be comparing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement for micro-osteperforation performed at 4, 8 and 12 weeks' intervals. In addition, the investigator will be evaluating the pain intensity and impact of pain on quality of life during different intervals of micro-osteoperforations at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Finally, the investigator will be comparing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement between maxilla and mandible.

The significance of the outcome is to determine optimum recommended interval for micro-osteopeforation which can be used to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. By finding out the optimum interval, the investigator can come with a recommended interval of micro-osteoperforation which can be used routinely in patients to fasten orthodontic tooth movement.

Detailed Description

  1. TRIAL DESIGN This is a prospective randomized clinical trial and single centre study (Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya). Participants included are molar class I malocclusion, molar Class II & III < ½ unit, requiring extraction of all four permanent first premolar and maximum anchorage control with Temporary Anchorage Device (TAD).
  2. SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION Sample size calculation is based on a type 1 error frequency of 5% and the power of the statistical test set at 90% ( P = 0.9, B = 0.1 ) This is based on animal study as a guide to detect at least 50% difference in the rate of tooth movement. ( Teixeira CC et al.,2010). The sample size was calculated based on a formula described by Lisa Kuramoto from Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute. Total participant needed with be 30 with minimum of 10 participants per group. We anticipate 20% drop-outs based on previous study. Thus, a minimum of 36 participants will be recruited.

4. ETHICAL APPROVAL Approval for the conduct of this study had been obtained from Medical Ethics Committee, University of Malaya 5. RANDOMIZATION This study will be conducted by one orthodontic resident together with one orthodontic Consultant from Faculty of Dentistry, University Malaya, who is the main supervisor of this study. A simple randomization method will be employed to assign patient into experimental site and also the for the frequency interval of micro-osteoperforation.

6. INTERVENTION Sequence of events during clinical trial is as follows:-

  1. Diagnostic record taking (Study models, Photographs, and x-ray)
  2. Randomization for experimental sites in maxilla and mandible & randomization for interval of micro-osteoperforation (Group 1: 4weeks maxilla & 8weeks mandible, Group 2: 8weeks maxilla & 12weeks mandible, Group 3: 12 weeks maxilla & 4 weeks mandible)
  3. Treatment planning with Orthodontic Consultant
  4. Placement of TADs bilaterally in maxilla and mandible & Clinical calibration for inter-observer error
  5. Referral for extraction of 14,24,34 and 44 (Extraction must be done within 2 weeks after insertion of TADs)
  6. One month after extraction, Banding and Bonding of upper and lower preadjusted edgewise fixed appliances (MBT prescription 0.022"x 0.028" slot).
  7. Arch wire sequence for levelling and aligning are as follows:-
  • Upper and lower 0.014 NiTi Arch wire
  • Upper and lower 0.018 NiTi Arch wire
  • Upper and lower 17 x 25 NiTi Arch wire
  • Upper and lower 19 x 25 SS Arch wire

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 45 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Molar Class I malocclusion, molar Class II & III < ½ unit, requiring extraction of all four permanent first premolar and maximum anchorage control with temporary anchorage device (TAD)
  • •Average vertical facial proportions
  • •No systemic disease
  • •Good oral hygiene
  • •No history of periodontal therapy
  • •No current active periodontal disease

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Vertical skeletal discrepancies eg high angle and low angle
  • •Systemic disease especially on long term use of antibiotics, phenytoin, cyclosporin, anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroid and calcium channel blockers
  • •Poor oral hygiene for more than 3 visits
  • •Past periodontal disease
  • •Current periodontal disease

Arms & Interventions

4 weeks and 8 weeks

Active Comparator

Micro-osteoperforation will be done on either side of the maxilla at 4 weeks interval and the contralateral site will be the control. In mandible, micro-osteoperforation will be done every 8 weeks and the contralateral site will serve as the control

Intervention: micro-osteoperforation (Procedure)

8 weeks and 12 weeks

Active Comparator

Micro-osteoperforation will be done on either side of the maxilla at 8 weeks interval and the contralateral site will be the control. In mandible, micro-osteoperforation will be done every 12 weeks and the contralateral site will serve as the control

Intervention: micro-osteoperforation (Procedure)

12 weeks and 4 weeks

Active Comparator

Micro-osteoperforation will be done on either side of the maxilla at 12 weeks interval and the contralateral site will be the control. In mandible, micro-osteoperforation will be done every 4 weeks and the contralateral site will serve as the control

Intervention: micro-osteoperforation (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

rate of orthodontic tooth movement between micro osteoperforated site and non micro-osteoperforated site.

Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pain intensity and impact of pain on patient's daily functions during different intervals of micro-osteoperforations at 4, 8 and 12 weeks using questionnaire.(through study completion, an average of 2 years)
  • Rate of orthodontic tooth movement between maxilla and mandible.(through study completion, an average of 2 years)
  • Rate of orthodontic tooth movement when micro-osteperforation performed at 4, 8 and 12 weeks intervals.(through study completion, an average of 2 years)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials