跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03030144
NCT03030144已完成不适用

Effectiveness of Nursing Recommendations for the Management of Urinary Incontinence in Nursing Homes: a Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial

Medical University of Graz2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 147 人开始时间: 2017年4月18日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
147
试验地点
2
主要终点
Difference of the frequency of daily urinary incontinence between intervention and control group

研究概览

简要总结

The international literature emphasizes the vast benefits of the effective implementation of evidence based nursing recommendations in improving patient care processes and enhancing health outcomes. The key role of nurses in the prevention, treatment and care of incontinence is highlighted. Studies have shown that UI is a neglected nursing care problem in Austria e.g. regarding diagnosis and nursing interventions. Nursing recommendations may enhance the frequency of diagnosis, the use of nursing interventions as well as decrease the frequency of daily UI in nursing home residents. Beside that little is known about nursing recommendations implementation regarding urinary incontinence in the nursing home setting, especially in the Austrian context.

The aim of this study is to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of evidence based nursing recommendations regarding UI in Austrian nursing homes.

详细描述

The aim of this study is to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of evidence based nursing recommendations regarding UI in Austrian nursing homes, including three research questions:

  1. What is the statistical difference between the frequency of daily UI in nursing home residents in the intervention group when compared to the control group?

  2. What is the statistical difference between the frequency of documented categorisation of UI (UI diagnosis) in the intervention group (implementation of the nursing recommendations) compared to the control group (standard care)?

  3. What is the statistical difference between the amounts of used nursing interventions in the intervention group compared to the control group?

  4. Methods 5.1. Design A three-month cluster-randomized trial will be conducted in nursing homes in Styria and Carinthia.

5.2. Setting All nursing homes in Styria and Carinthia with a capacity ≥ 50 beds registered in a national database [15] will be invited to participate by means of an information flyer and email. With regards to practicability invitation will be started with those nursing homes with the highest number of beds.

5.3. Sample Currently there are 176 nursing homes in Styria and Carinthia with a capacity ≥ 50 beds registered in a national database with a total of 15208 nursing home residents. Through experiences from former projects a low response rate is expected. We assume a response rate of 2% on the nursing home level, amounting to 3 participating nursing homes with 259 residents. Nursing homes that want to participate voluntarily will be contacted via telephone starting at the largest for further inclusion criteria.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
60 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • The management of the institution agrees to the random allocation to the intervention or control group.
  • A clinical guideline including evidence based nursing recommendations related to UI has not been introduced and implemented.
  • Nursing staff have not received a specialized training in the last 2 years on UI prevention or management.
  • Less than 5 other major nursing care innovation projects have been implemented during the last two years.
  • Within the institution there is no specialized nurse employed for the management of incontinence.
  • Inclusion criteria for nursing home residents are living in the nursing home at the date of baseline measurement and being female and assumed to stay for the whole duration of the study (3 months).

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Control group

No Intervention

Routine nursing care

Intervention group

Other

Evidence based nursing recommendations for the management of urinary incontinence will be introduced.

干预措施: Evidence based nursing recommendations (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Difference of the frequency of daily urinary incontinence between intervention and control group

时间窗: 3 month

Collected after 3 Month

次要结局

  • Difference of nurses diagnoses for urinary incontinence between intervention and control group(3 Month)
  • Difference between the intervention and control group in the use of nursing interventions(3 Month)

研究者

发起方
Medical University of Graz
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验