Preoperative endoscopic versus percutaneous biliary drainage in potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: DRAINAGE Trial
- Conditions
- Klatskin tumorperihilar bile duct tumorPerihilar cholangiocarcinoma10019654
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON41627
- Lead Sponsor
- Academisch Medisch Centrum
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 106
• Diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
• No apparent signs of irresectability on CT-scan and/or MRI, and scheduled to undergo a *curative* liver resection (may need additional lymph node biopsies or a diagnostic laparoscopy to further determine resectability);
• Inadequate preoperative biliary drainage.
For drainage naïve patients this is defined as:
* Serum bilirubin level >= 50 µmol/l;
For drainage non-naïve patients this is defined as:
* Persistent hyperbilirubinemia
* or inadequate drainage of the future remnant liver (stent positioned in contra-lateral side)
• Both the endoscopic and the percutaneous drainage methods are technically feasible.
• Incomplete recovery from side-effects of any prior stenting attempt, including signs of active cholangitis.
• ECOG/WHO score >=3
• Any other contraindication for major liver surgery
• No informed consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The number of drainage related complications between treatment allocation and<br /><br>explorative laparotomy. Complications in this composite endpoint are consist of:<br /><br>- Stent dysfunction<br /><br>- Cholangitis<br /><br>- Acute cholecystitis<br /><br>- Acute pancreatitis<br /><br>- Hemorrhage<br /><br>- Perforation<br /><br>- Portal vein thrombosis<br /><br>- Dehydration</p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method