A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Functional Outcome After Knee Replacement
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Interventions
- Device: Off the Shelf Total Knee ReplacementDevice: ConforMIS iTotal Knee Replacement
- Registration Number
- NCT02494544
- Lead Sponsor
- Restor3D
- Brief Summary
Patients will be consecutively enrolled by implant. Implant groups will be those who have undergone surgery with either a ConforMIS iTotal® CR TKA or an Off-the- Shelf (OTS) system.
The patient will conduct functional testing and answer questionnaires.
The results will compare the ConforMIS iTotal with an Off the Shelf Knee replacement.
- Detailed Description
To compare functional and patient reported outcome data for a consecutively enrolled group of subjects who have undergone surgery with either a ConforMIS iTotal® CR TKA or an Off-the- Shelf (OTS) system.The person conducting the functional testing will be blinded to the device implanted. Sites will perform the off-the-shelf total knees conventional instrumentation.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 187
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SEQUENTIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description DePuy total knee replacement Off the Shelf Total Knee Replacement Off the shelf knee replacement system ConforMIS iTotal Knee replacement ConforMIS iTotal Knee Replacement iTotal patient-specific knee replacement system Stryker total knee replacement Off the Shelf Total Knee Replacement Off the shelf knee replacement system Smith & Nephew total knee replacement Off the Shelf Total Knee Replacement Off the shelf knee replacement system Zimmer total knee replacement Off the Shelf Total Knee Replacement Off the shelf knee replacement system Biomet total knee replacement Off the Shelf Total Knee Replacement Off the shelf knee replacement system
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Functional Testing 1 year Comparing the functional testing differences between iTotal and off the shelf
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient reported outcome using questionnaires such as the KOOS and VAS 1 year Measuring and comparing the differences between iTotal and off the shelf knees with patient reported outcomes.
Incidents of major procedure-related and device related complications (including revision rates) 1 year To compare revision rates between groups
Post-operative limb alignment based using x-ray views 1 year To compare post-operative limb alignment between two groups
Trial Locations
- Locations (8)
The Lindner Center for Research and Education
🇺🇸Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
University of California in San Diego
🇺🇸La Jolla, California, United States
Denver-Vail Orthopedics
🇺🇸Parker, Colorado, United States
Yale School of Medicine
🇺🇸New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Tufts University
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Missouri
🇺🇸Columbia, Missouri, United States
OrthoNY
🇺🇸Albany, New York, United States
Sharp Healthcare
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States