跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/03/081661
CTRI/2025/03/081661尚未招募不适用

ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) VS STANDARD PROTOCOL IN PEPTIC PRFORATION: A STUDY IN TERTIARY CARE CENTRE OF SOUTHERN ODISHA

Mkcg medical college1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2025年3月15日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
90
试验地点
1
主要终点
DURATION OF STAY.

研究概览

简要总结

•ERAS protocols, are based on an evidence based modification of peri operative care elements  focusing on reduced physiological and psychological stress.

This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness, feasibility and safety of ERAS protocols in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for perforated duodenal ulcers

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 80.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Peptic perforation (duodenal).

排除标准

  • Perforation Size more than 1cm Shock at time of presentation Ckd or cld patient Pregnancy Multiple perforations Malignant perforation Sealed perforation Chronic steroid abuse Patient requiring long term catheterization for other indication Patient requiring post op ventilatory support for more than 12 hours.

结局指标

主要结局

DURATION OF STAY.

时间窗: No of days in hospital

次要结局

  • FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY PARAMETERS AND MORBIDITY.(1.Recovery of functional parameters (time of withdrawal of NG tube, time to first flatus, stool, fluid diet, Solid diet, reappearance of bowel sound, time to removal of foleys catheter and drains, time to ambulation.))

研究者

发起方
Mkcg medical college
申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Biswajita Rautaray

Mkcg medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验