MedPath

An Evaluation of Dupilumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Uncontrolled Asthma

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Asthma
Interventions
Drug: placebo
Drug: ICS/LABA therapy
Drug: Salbutamol/albuterol
Drug: Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol
Registration Number
NCT01854047
Lead Sponsor
Sanofi
Brief Summary

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of different doses and regimens of dupilumab in participants with moderate to severe uncontrolled asthma.

Secondary Objective:

To evaluate different doses and regimens of dupilumab in participants with moderate to severe uncontrolled asthma, with regard to:

* Safety and tolerability

* Dupilumab systemic exposure and anti-drug antibodies

Detailed Description

Total duration per participant of approximately 43 weeks including a screening period (14-21 days), a randomized treatment period (24 weeks), and a post-treatment period (16 weeks).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
776
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wDupilumab2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 mg (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1), followed by a single 200 mg injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wICS/LABA therapy2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a Placebo alternating with single 300 mg injection of Dupilumab q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wICS/LABA therapy2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 mg (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1), followed by a single 200 mg injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wLevosalbutamol/levalbuterol2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 mg (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a Placebo alternating with single 200 mg injection of Dupilumab q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wICS/LABA therapy2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1), followed by a single 300 mg injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable inhaled corticosteroid/ long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wLevosalbutamol/levalbuterol2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a Placebo alternating with single 300 mg injection of Dupilumab q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wplacebo2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 mg (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a Placebo alternating with single 200 mg injection of Dupilumab q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wSalbutamol/albuterol2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 mg (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a Placebo alternating with single 200 mg injection of Dupilumab q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wLevosalbutamol/levalbuterol2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 mg (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1), followed by a single 200 mg injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wDupilumab2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a Placebo alternating with single 300 mg injection of Dupilumab q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wplacebo2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a Placebo alternating with single 300 mg injection of Dupilumab q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wICS/LABA therapy2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 mg (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a Placebo alternating with single 200 mg injection of Dupilumab q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wSalbutamol/albuterol2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1), followed by a single 300 mg injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable inhaled corticosteroid/ long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wLevosalbutamol/levalbuterol2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1), followed by a single 300 mg injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable inhaled corticosteroid/ long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 200 mg q2wSalbutamol/albuterol2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 mg (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1), followed by a single 200 mg injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 300 mg q4wSalbutamol/albuterol2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a Placebo alternating with single 300 mg injection of Dupilumab q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Placebo q2wplacebo2 subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a single injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Placebo q2wICS/LABA therapy2 subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a single injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Placebo q2wSalbutamol/albuterol2 subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a single injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Placebo q2wLevosalbutamol/levalbuterol2 subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a single injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 300 mg q2wDupilumab2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1), followed by a single 300 mg injection q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable inhaled corticosteroid/ long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Dupilumab 200 mg q4wDupilumab2 subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 200 mg (for a total of 400 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1 (Week 1) followed by a Placebo alternating with single 200 mg injection of Dupilumab q2w from Week 2 to Week 22 added to stable ICS/LABA therapy. Salbutamol/albuterol or Levosalbutamol/levalbuterol was given as reliever medication.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Absolute Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12: High Eosinophils -Intent to Treat (HEos-ITT) PopulationBaseline, Week 12

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Absolute Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Annualized Event Rate of LOAC During The Treatment Period: ITT PopulationBaseline to Week 24

LOAC was defined as any of the following: \>=6 additional reliever puffs of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days; increase in ICS \>=4 times the dose at randomization; use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of LOAC that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Change From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

Participants might administered salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol as reliever medication as needed during the study. The number of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol inhalations were recorded by the participants in their electronic diary.

Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: ITT PopulationBaseline up to Week 24

The time to first LOAC event was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first LOAC event. For participants who had no LOAC event on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first LOAC was not estimated because the number of LOAC was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of LOAC at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics.

Change From Baseline in AQLQ Global Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Time to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline up to Week 24

The time to first severe exacerbation was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first severe exacerbation event. For participants who had no severe exacerbation on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first severe exacerbation was not estimated because the number of severe exacerbations was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of severe exacerbation at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics.

Time to First Severe Exacerbation: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and 24: ITT PopulationBaseline up to Week 24

The time to first severe exacerbation was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first severe exacerbation event. For participants who had no severe exacerbation on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first severe exacerbation was not estimated because the number of severe exacerbations was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of severe exacerbation at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics.

Annualized Event Rate of Loss of Asthma Control (LOAC) During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline to Week 24

LOAC was defined as any of the following: \>=6 additional reliever puffs of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol in a 24-hour period (compared to baseline) on 2 consecutive days; increase in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) \>=4 times the dose at randomization; use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of LOAC that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

Evening asthma symptom score was determined using PM symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the day. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms, 1=one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness, 2=more than one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness without interference of normal activities, 3=wheezing, cough, or breathlessness most of the day, which interfered to some extent with normal activities, 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual.

Annualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline to Week 24

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item Version (ACQ-5) Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control.

Change From Baseline in Number of Inhalations Per Day of Salbutamol/Albuterol or Levosalbutamol/Levalbuterol at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

Participants might administered salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol as reliever medication as needed during the study. The number of salbutamol/albuterol or levosalbutamol/levalbuterol inhalations were recorded by the participants in their electronic diary.

Percent Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

FEV1 was the volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration as measured by spirometer.

Annualized Event Rate of Severe Exacerbation During The Treatment Period: ITT PopulationBaseline to Week 24

A severe exacerbation was defined as a deterioration of asthma requiring: use of systemic corticosteroids for \>=3 days; or hospitalization or emergency room visit because of asthma, requiring systemic corticosteroids. Annualized event rate was the total number of exacerbations that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of participant-years treated.

Time to First LOAC Event: Kaplan-Meier Estimates at Week 12 and Week 24: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline up to Week 24

The time to first LOAC event was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first LOAC event. For participants who had no LOAC event on or before last dose date + 14 days, it was censored at the date of last dose date + 14 days. The median time to first LOAC was not estimated because the number of LOAC was too low in the Dupilumab arms. Therefore, alternative Kaplan-Meier statistics, the probability of LOAC at Week 12 and 24, are presented as the descriptive measure statistics.

Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

Morning asthma symptom score was determined using AM (ante meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the night. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0 = No asthma symptoms, slept through the night, 1= Slept well, but some complaints in the morning, no night-time awakenings, 2= Woke up once because of asthma (including early awakening), 3= Woke up several times because of asthma (including early awakening), 4= Bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma.

Change From Baseline in Morning Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

Morning asthma symptom score was determined using AM symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the night. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0 = No asthma symptoms, slept through the night, 1= Slept well, but some complaints in the morning, no night-time awakenings, 2= Woke up once because of asthma (including early awakening), 3= Woke up several times because of asthma (including early awakening), 4= Bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma.

Change From Baseline in Evening Asthma Symptom Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

Evening asthma symptom score was determined using PM (post meridiem) symptom scoring system which evaluated participant's overall asthma symptoms experienced during the day. It ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms, 1=one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness, 2=more than one episode of wheezing, cough, or breathlessness without interference of normal activities, 3=wheezing, cough, or breathlessness most of the day, which interfered to some extent with normal activities, 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual.

Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

The ACQ-5 has 5 questions, reflecting the top-scoring five asthma symptoms: woken at night by symptoms, wake in the mornings with symptoms, limitation of daily activities, shortness of breath and wheeze. Participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond to each of the five symptom questions on a 7-point scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). ACQ-5 total score was mean of the scores of all 5 questions and, therefore, ranged from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicated lower asthma control.

Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Global Score at Week 12: HEos-ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to participants with asthma. The AQLQ comprises of 32 items in 4 domains: symptoms (12 items), activity limitation (11 items), emotional function (5 items), environmental stimuli (4 items). Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1=maximal impairment, 7=no impairment). The 32 items of the questionnaire are averaged to produce one overall quality of life score ranging from 1 (severely impaired) to 7 (not impaired at all). Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Trial Locations

Locations (201)

Investigational Site Number 392024

🇯🇵

Sakai-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392003

🇯🇵

Toride-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392035

🇯🇵

Yokohama-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392018

🇯🇵

Tsukubo-Gun, Japan

Investigational Site Number 152011

🇨🇱

Santiago, Chile

Investigational Site Number 152001

🇨🇱

Santiago, Chile

Investigational Site Number 840041

🇺🇸

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 392042

🇯🇵

Isesaki-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 840013

🇺🇸

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840014

🇺🇸

Rolling Hills Estates, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840032

🇺🇸

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Investigational Site Number 840036

🇺🇸

San Jose, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840043

🇺🇸

Denver, Colorado, United States

Investigational Site Number 840040

🇺🇸

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Investigational Site Number 840006

🇺🇸

Denver, Colorado, United States

Investigational Site Number 840024

🇺🇸

Denver, Colorado, United States

Investigational Site Number 840048

🇺🇸

Albany, Georgia, United States

Investigational Site Number 840027

🇺🇸

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Investigational Site Number 840026

🇺🇸

River Forest, Illinois, United States

Investigational Site Number 840053

🇺🇸

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Investigational Site Number 840017

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Investigational Site Number 840052

🇺🇸

Wheaton, Maryland, United States

Investigational Site Number 840045

🇺🇸

North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States

Investigational Site Number 840018

🇺🇸

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Investigational Site Number 840002

🇺🇸

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Investigational Site Number 840003

🇺🇸

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Investigational Site Number 840004

🇺🇸

Papillion, Nebraska, United States

Investigational Site Number 840016

🇺🇸

Rochester, New York, United States

Investigational Site Number 840020

🇺🇸

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Investigational Site Number 840015

🇺🇸

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Investigational Site Number 840001

🇺🇸

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Investigational Site Number 840031

🇺🇸

Lake Oswego, Oregon, United States

Investigational Site Number 840009

🇺🇸

Upland, Pennsylvania, United States

Investigational Site Number 840005

🇺🇸

El Paso, Texas, United States

Investigational Site Number 840008

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Investigational Site Number 840054

🇺🇸

Everett, Washington, United States

Investigational Site Number 840035

🇺🇸

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Investigational Site Number 840033

🇺🇸

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Investigational Site Number 032008

🇦🇷

Caba, Argentina

Investigational Site Number 032004

🇦🇷

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Investigational Site Number 032003

🇦🇷

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Investigational Site Number 032002

🇦🇷

La Plata, Argentina

Investigational Site Number 032001

🇦🇷

Caba, Argentina

Investigational Site Number 032005

🇦🇷

Rosario, Argentina

Investigational Site Number 032006

🇦🇷

Rosario, Argentina

Investigational Site Number 032007

🇦🇷

Rosario, Argentina

Investigational Site Number 032012

🇦🇷

Santa Fe, Argentina

Investigational Site Number 036004

🇦🇺

Adelaide, Australia

Investigational Site Number 032009

🇦🇷

Tucumán, Argentina

Investigational Site Number 036002

🇦🇺

Brisbane, Australia

Investigational Site Number 036001

🇦🇺

Clayton, Australia

Investigational Site Number 036005

🇦🇺

Campbelltown, Australia

Investigational Site Number 392020

🇯🇵

Naka-Gun, Japan

Investigational Site Number 036008

🇦🇺

Frankston, Australia

Investigational Site Number 036003

🇦🇺

Nedlands, Australia

Investigational Site Number 036009

🇦🇺

Prahran, Australia

Investigational Site Number 036006

🇦🇺

Woolloongabba, Australia

Investigational Site Number 152007

🇨🇱

Quillota, Chile

Investigational Site Number 152002

🇨🇱

Santiago, Chile

Investigational Site Number 152014

🇨🇱

Santiago, Chile

Investigational Site Number 152003

🇨🇱

Santiago, Chile

Investigational Site Number 152005

🇨🇱

Santiago, Chile

Investigational Site Number 152012

🇨🇱

Santiago, Chile

Investigational Site Number 152013

🇨🇱

Santiago, Chile

Investigational Site Number 152008

🇨🇱

Talca, Chile

Investigational Site Number 152006

🇨🇱

Viña Del Mar, Chile

Investigational Site Number 250009

🇫🇷

Brest Cedex, France

Investigational Site Number 250004

🇫🇷

Grenoble Cedex 09, France

Investigational Site Number 250010

🇫🇷

Lille, France

Investigational Site Number 250006

🇫🇷

Lyon, France

Investigational Site Number 250001

🇫🇷

Marseille, France

Investigational Site Number 250002

🇫🇷

Montpellier, France

Investigational Site Number 250005

🇫🇷

Nantes, France

Investigational Site Number 250007

🇫🇷

Nimes, France

Investigational Site Number 250003

🇫🇷

Pessac, France

Investigational Site Number 250008

🇫🇷

Strasbourg, France

Investigational Site Number 250011

🇫🇷

Vernon, France

Investigational Site Number 380010

🇮🇹

Ancona, Italy

Investigational Site Number 380009

🇮🇹

Catania, Italy

Investigational Site Number 380002

🇮🇹

Firenze, Italy

Investigational Site Number 380007

🇮🇹

Padova, Italy

Investigational Site Number 380001

🇮🇹

Pisa, Italy

Investigational Site Number 380006

🇮🇹

Verona, Italy

Investigational Site Number 392009

🇯🇵

Asahi-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392012

🇯🇵

Edogawa-Ku, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392007

🇯🇵

Chuoh-Ku, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392037

🇯🇵

Chiyoda-Ku, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392002

🇯🇵

Chuo-Ku, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392017

🇯🇵

Fukuoka-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392021

🇯🇵

Fukuyama-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392004

🇯🇵

Himeji-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392032

🇯🇵

Hirakata-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392030

🇯🇵

Habikino-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392013

🇯🇵

Iizuka-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392023

🇯🇵

Kanazawa-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392026

🇯🇵

Itabashi-Ku, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392001

🇯🇵

Kitakyushu-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392025

🇯🇵

Kobe-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392022

🇯🇵

Kiyose-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392040

🇯🇵

Kodaira-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392044

🇯🇵

Kokubunji-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392010

🇯🇵

Kurashiki-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392036

🇯🇵

Kyoto-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392041

🇯🇵

Nagaoka-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392015

🇯🇵

Nakano-Ku, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392005

🇯🇵

Naruto-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392043

🇯🇵

Ohta-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392019

🇯🇵

Sagamihara-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392011

🇯🇵

Sakaide-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392008

🇯🇵

Sapporo-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392038

🇯🇵

Setagaya-Ku, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392034

🇯🇵

Sapporo-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392006

🇯🇵

Tomakomai-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392028

🇯🇵

Sumida-Ku, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392014

🇯🇵

Yokohama-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392029

🇯🇵

Tsu-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 392045

🇯🇵

Uruma-Shi, Japan

Investigational Site Number 410002

🇰🇷

Bucheon, Korea, Republic of

Investigational Site Number 410003

🇰🇷

Cheongju, Korea, Republic of

Investigational Site Number 410004

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Investigational Site Number 410005

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Investigational Site Number 484004

🇲🇽

Mexico City, Mexico

Investigational Site Number 410001

🇰🇷

Suwon, Korea, Republic of

Investigational Site Number 484001

🇲🇽

Guadalajara, Mexico

Investigational Site Number 484006

🇲🇽

Chihuahua, Mexico

Investigational Site Number 484005

🇲🇽

Distrito Federal, Mexico

Investigational Site Number 554001

🇳🇿

Dunedin, New Zealand

Investigational Site Number 484003

🇲🇽

Monterrey, Mexico

Investigational Site Number 554002

🇳🇿

Wellington, New Zealand

Investigational Site Number 616004

🇵🇱

Gdansk, Poland

Investigational Site Number 616006

🇵🇱

Bialystok, Poland

Investigational Site Number 616003

🇵🇱

Gdansk, Poland

Investigational Site Number 616007

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Investigational Site Number 616001

🇵🇱

Lodz, Poland

Investigational Site Number 616005

🇵🇱

Lodz, Poland

Investigational Site Number 616008

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Poland

Investigational Site Number 643002

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

Investigational Site Number 643003

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

Investigational Site Number 643007

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

Investigational Site Number 643001

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

Investigational Site Number 643012

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

Investigational Site Number 643010

🇷🇺

Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation

Investigational Site Number 643006

🇷🇺

Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Investigational Site Number 643011

🇷🇺

Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation

Investigational Site Number 643009

🇷🇺

St-Petersburg, Russian Federation

Investigational Site Number 643008

🇷🇺

Yaroslavl, Russian Federation

Investigational Site Number 710001

🇿🇦

Cape Town, South Africa

Investigational Site Number 710002

🇿🇦

Cape Town, South Africa

Investigational Site Number 724001

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

Investigational Site Number 724002

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

Investigational Site Number 724005

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

Investigational Site Number 724004

🇪🇸

Cáceres, Spain

Investigational Site Number 724006

🇪🇸

Pozuelo De Alarcón, Spain

Investigational Site Number 724003

🇪🇸

Sabadell, Spain

Investigational Site Number 792002

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

Investigational Site Number 792008

🇹🇷

Bursa, Turkey

Investigational Site Number 724007

🇪🇸

Sant Boi De Llobregat, Spain

Investigational Site Number 792011

🇹🇷

Amasya, Turkey

Investigational Site Number 792001

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

Investigational Site Number 792007

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

Investigational Site Number 792004

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

Investigational Site Number 792003

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

Investigational Site Number 792013

🇹🇷

Kirikkale, Turkey

Investigational Site Number 792005

🇹🇷

Izmir, Turkey

Investigational Site Number 804016

🇺🇦

Donetsk, Ukraine

Investigational Site Number 804003

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Investigational Site Number 804002

🇺🇦

Poltava, Ukraine

Investigational Site Number 804012

🇺🇦

Zaporozhye, Ukraine

Investigational Site Number 804001

🇺🇦

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Investigational Site Number 792006

🇹🇷

Mersin, Turkey

Investigational Site Number 804004

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Investigational Site Number 804018

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Investigational Site Number 804020

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Investigational Site Number 804008

🇺🇦

Kyiv, Ukraine

Investigational Site Number 804006

🇺🇦

Odessa, Ukraine

Investigational Site Number 804019

🇺🇦

Vinnytsya, Ukraine

Investigational Site Number 804015

🇺🇦

Yalta, Ukraine

Investigational Site Number 840050

🇺🇸

Fullerton, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840019

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840022

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840029

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840044

🇺🇸

Newport Beach, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840051

🇺🇸

Novi, Michigan, United States

Investigational Site Number 840037

🇺🇸

Missoula, Montana, United States

Investigational Site Number 840011

🇺🇸

Princeton, New Jersey, United States

Investigational Site Number 840034

🇺🇸

Medford, Oregon, United States

Investigational Site Number 840042

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Investigational Site Number 840010

🇺🇸

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Investigational Site Number 840021

🇺🇸

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Investigational Site Number 840023

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

Investigational Site Number 840007

🇺🇸

Riverside, California, United States

Investigational Site Number 840039

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

Investigational Site Number 840030

🇺🇸

Owensboro, Kentucky, United States

Investigational Site Number 840028

🇺🇸

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Investigational Site Number 840046

🇺🇸

Novi, Michigan, United States

Investigational Site Number 032010

🇦🇷

Caba, Argentina

Investigational Site Number 380004

🇮🇹

Ferrara, Italy

Investigational Site Number 380008

🇮🇹

Foggia, Italy

Investigational Site Number 380003

🇮🇹

Modena, Italy

Investigational Site Number 380005

🇮🇹

Torino, Italy

Investigational Site Number 840025

🇺🇸

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath