Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00816166
NCT00816166
Terminated
Phase 2

Phase III Study of Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System Compared to Best Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Ischemic Disease

Codman & Shurtleff0 sites125 target enrollmentOctober 2008

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System (Stent implantation) + Medical therapy (Aspirin and Clopidogrel)
Conditions
Ischemic Stroke
Sponsor
Codman & Shurtleff
Enrollment
125
Primary Endpoint
Successful Outcome: No Stroke or Hard TIA in the Same Territory Within 12 Months
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The main objective of this study is to prospectively evaluate the safety, probable benefit, and effectiveness of the PHAROS Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System in a multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

A secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of stenting in the neurovasculature to treat cerebral ischemia on other outcomes such as hospital length of stay, charges, and costs.

Detailed Description

1.1 Study Hypothesis Treatment of cerebral or retinal ischemia due to plaque in the neurovasculature using the PHAROS Vitesse Stent System plus medical therapy will provide additional clinical benefit over medical therapy alone. 1.2 Primary Effectiveness Endpoint The primary effectiveness endpoint consists of a composite of the two following outcomes: * Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization * Hard TIA in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 post-randomization 1.3 Safety Outcomes Safety outcomes to be collected and reported as part of the overall risk-to-benefit profile for this device are: * Stroke in any territory within 30 days of randomization * Death from any cause within 30 days of randomization * Hard TIA in any territory occurring after a 24 hour post-procedure stabilization period (days 2-30) since the recovery from anesthesia can mask accurate assessment of possible TIA symptoms. * Intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days of randomization 1.4 Other Outcomes * Stent Success - PHAROS Vitesse stent deployed across target lesion with residual stenosis 0-20% * Percentage of Stent Group Subjects with any (symptomatic or asymptomatic) in-stent restenosis ≥ 70% confirmed by angiogram at 12 months * Percentage of Stent Group Subjects with symptomatic in-stent restenosis ≥ 70% confirmed by angiogram at 12 months * Percentage of Medical Therapy Group Subjects with interventional procedure (e.g., angioplasty or stent) at 12 months * Comparison of NIHSS scores between treatment arms * Comparison of mRS scores between treatment arms

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2008
End Date
June 2014
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Codman & Shurtleff
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject has at least one neurovascular lesion (70-99%) stenosis \[internal carotid, middle cerebral, vertebral artery (C4-BA), and/or basilar artery\] symptomatic with a hard TIA or stroke attributable to the territory of the lesion within the past 30 days. An intracranial tandem lesion (50-99%) stenosis may be treated if normal artery segment is sufficient length to avoid overlapping stents.
  • Target vessel diameter / lesion length measurements are within one of the below per angiogram:
  • Vessel diameter is ≥ 2.0 mm and \< 2.5 mm / lesion length is ≤ 16 mm, or
  • Vessel diameter is ≥ 2.5 mm and \< 3.0 mm / lesion length is ≤ 18 mm, or
  • Vessel diameter is ≥ 3.0 mm and \< 4.5 mm / lesion length is ≤ 26 mm, or
  • Vessel diameter is ≥ 4.5 mm and ≤ 5.0 mm / lesion length is ≤ 31 mm
  • Subject has normal artery adjacent to each stenosis; diameter 2.0 mm - 5.0 mm
  • Subject age is 18-85 years
  • Life expectancy is at least 2 years
  • Subject 's mRS score is ≤ 3

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subject has contraindications for balloon expandable stent, e.g.
  • Extreme tortuosity at, or proximal to, target lesion,
  • More than 2 lesions with \> 50% stenosis (including vertebral ostia and common carotid disease),
  • Carotid or vertebral dissection
  • CT scan or MRI evidence of any of the following:
  • Intracranial hemorrhage of type PH1 or PH2
  • Subdural or epidural hemorrhage
  • Mass effect, or
  • Intracranial tumor (except small meningioma)
  • Subject has a previous stent in the territory of the target lesion(s)

Arms & Interventions

Stent Group

Medical therapy + PHAROS Vitesse neurovascular stent ("Stent Group")

Intervention: Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System (Stent implantation) + Medical therapy (Aspirin and Clopidogrel)

Medical Therapy Group

Medical therapy alone ("Medical Therapy Group")

Intervention: Aspirin and Clopidogrel (Medical therapy)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Successful Outcome: No Stroke or Hard TIA in the Same Territory Within 12 Months

Time Frame: One Year

The primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of the two following outcomes: * Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization * Hard Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 post-randomization A subject was deemed to be a primary endpoint success if neither of these outcomes occurred. The Kaplan-Meier success rate at 12-months post-operatively was calculated with Kaplan-Meier time-to-event methodology, where the time variable for patients who were successful (no stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of last follow-up, and the time variable for patients who were not successful (had a stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of the first event (stroke with 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months).

Similar Trials