TCTR20210402002RecruitingPhase 4
Comparative study of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion vs full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a randomized-multicenter study.
/A0 sites80 target enrollmentStarted: April 2, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 80
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 30 Years to 90 Years (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •1.Single level lumbar pathology required fusion surgery
- •2.Failure to conservative management for at least 3 month period.
- •3.MRI and clinical features are consistent.
Exclusion Criteria
- •1.Previous surgery
- •2.Infection cause
- •3.Tumor cause
Investigators
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Comparison of 2 methods for treatment of missing gums in between teeth.CTRI/2024/02/063384Bindu DR
Completed
Not Applicable
Clinical evaluation comparing minimally invasive and standard skin incisions in cementless total hip arthroplasty using the Bimetric Hip system with the 38mm M2A cup. Clinical evaluation of incision size in total hip replacementISRCTN17429244Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2007 Update - Department of Health (UK)
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of the minimally invasive surgical treatment outcomes of itra-extra articular calcaneal fracture’s and non operative treatment in valiasr hospitalCalcaneus fracture.Fracture of calcaneusIRCT2017092720258N62Vice chancellor for research, Arak University of Medical Sciences40
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Home-Based Program in Postpartum Patients with Low Back PaiIRCT20210205050256N2niversity of Lahore100
Completed
Phase 2
Study of the effect of surfactant in respiratory distress of preterm neonatesRespiratory distress of newborn.Respiratory distress of newborn, unspecifiedIRCT2014080716937N4Tehran University of Medical Sciences50