Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05315466
NCT05315466CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison Between Surgical and Conservative Treatment for Lumbar Stenosis

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentStarted: August 8, 2012Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Back and leg pain assessed by VAS

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the outcomes of surgical treatment and conservative treatment at medium- and long-term period (minimum 2 years) in patients with lumbar stenosis who come to the observation of the PI's Team at the Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, through a series exhaustive questionnaires to self-administer to patients in order to define a path of "decision-making" as effective as possible for the patient and the doctor.

Detailed Description

Non-surgical treatment:

Conservative treatment may include different approaches, such as analgesics, anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxants, physical therapy, Global Postural Rehabilitation, magnetic therapy, laser therapy, TENS, massage, cognitive-behavioral therapy and all those procedures that can bring benefit in back and legs pain.

Surgical treatment:

Surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis is the decompression surgery which relieves the nerve structures to prevent permanent neurological damage. Decompression can be made on one or more segments of the spine and can be done with laminectomy, hemilaminectomy, laminotomy.

During a laminotomy part of the vertebral lamina is removed above and below the compressed nerve. The opening created is sometimes enough to relieve the compression on the nerve. In most cases, also the disc material and bone spur that compress the nerve are removed.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Confirmatory imaging study (MRI or CT) showing lumbar spinal stenosis at one or more levels (L2 to sacrum) defined as narrowing of the central spinal canal, lateral recesses, or neural foramens due to encroachment on the neural structures by the surrounding bone and soft tissue.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients are not eligible if they have evidence of instability on lateral flexion- extension radiographs, defined as a change of #10° of angulation of adjacent segments by Cobb measurement or a change of more than 4 mm of anteroposterior or posteroanterior translation.

Arms & Interventions

Non-surgical treatment

Experimental

Different types of non-surgical treatments

Intervention: Non-surgical treatment (Procedure)

Surgical treatment

Experimental

Surgical treatment for spinal stenosis

Intervention: Surgical treatment for spinal stenosis (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Back and leg pain assessed by VAS

Time Frame: Change from baseline VAS at 3, 6, 12, 24 months

Self-administered questionnaires for patients to evaluate back and leg pain (VAS score)

Functional activity assessed by ODI

Time Frame: Change from baseline ODI at 3, 6, 12, 24 months

Self-administered questionnaires for patients to evaluate a disability index (ODI)

Quality of life assessed by EQ-5D

Time Frame: Change from baseline EQ-5D at 3, 6, 12, 24 months

Self-administered questionnaires for patients to evaluate the quality of life (EQ-5D)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Complications(6, 12, 24 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials