Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06197516
NCT06197516CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison Of Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique Versus Neuromuscular Reeducation in Patients With Deep Gluteal Syndrome

Riphah International University1 site in 1 country54 target enrollmentStarted: April 10, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
54
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Goniometer

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Rationale of this research is to evaluate the outcome of Comparison of Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition technique versus Neuromuscular reeducation on pain in patients with Deep Gluteal Syndrome. The significance of this study is to identify which technique is superior in alleviating the symptoms of deep gluteal syndrome. This study will help gather evidence on the practice of incorporating trigger point therapy in the treatment of deep gluteal syndrome.

Detailed Description

Deep gluteal syndrome is a common buttock and posterior hip pain caused by entrapment of the sciatic nerve in the posterior hip region. Nonoperative therapy involves treating the entrapment location, using rest, anti-inflammatories, musclerelaxants, and physical therapy to relieve compression. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique versus Neuromuscular Reeducation Technique on pain in subject with deep gluteal syndrome. It was a randomized, controlled trial, conducted among deep gluteal syndrome patients. Sample size was 54 by using G Power Tool software. Participantswere randomly assigned to the intervention or control group after a baseline assessment with a lottery ticket and an opaque envelope. All participants in both groups were evaluated on baseline and 12 th Session.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
30 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Both genders Age: 30-50 years Pain due to a non-discogenic sciatic nerve entrapment in the sub gluteal space Pain, tightness and dysesthesias in the buttock area, posterior thigh Buttock pain aggravated with prolong sitting (>20-30 min) Buttock pain aggravated when sitting with limited straight leg raising ability (seated piriformis test) Pain with the passive internal rotation of hip (Freiberg sign) Pain increase in Flexion, Adduction and internal rotation (Positive FAIR test)

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patient with any Intrinsic Etiology such as hemarthrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, infection or gout Patient with any severe trauma, fractures dislocation, subluxation or ligament injury Any pathology or recent injury around the hip, sacroiliac joint, or lumbar spine Limb length discrepancy Recent buttock trauma and bladder/bowel dysfunction

Arms & Interventions

Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique

Experimental

Individuals in Group A, After palpating the trigger point ischemic compression were applied for 20-60 sec while strain counterstain for 60-90 sec and MET is for 7-10 sec. This technique was repeat 3-4 time per session Conventional treatment include Hot Pack for 5mins, AROM exercises ,Home plans include stretching exercise of glutes,hamstring and calf (5-7 reps x 10 sec hold, each).

Intervention: Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique (Other)

Neuromuscular Reeducation Technique

Active Comparator

Deep pressure were applied along origin and insertion of Piriformis and hamstring muscle combined with active movement of patient for 5 -15 time as per required (depend upon thickness of scar) per session, 10 sec rest b/w pressure. This technique given 5 time per session. Conventional treatment include Hot Pack for 5mins, AROM exercises ,Home plans include stretching exercise of glutes,hamstring and calf (5-7 reps x 10 sec hold, each).

Intervention: Neuromuscular Reeducation Technique (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Goniometer

Time Frame: 4th week

used to assess lower limb ranges

Sciatica Bothersomeness Index

Time Frame: 4th week

used to measure the participants' level of sciatica. The scale's ratings range from 0 to 24, with higher levels indicating severe sciatica discomfort.

NPRS

Time Frame: 4th week

Numeric Pain Rate Scale used to assess pain intensity

Lower Extremity Functional scale

Time Frame: 4th week

LEFS questionnaire have 20 questions will assess the impairment of a patient with lower extremity musculoskeletal condition or disorders

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials