MedPath

Effect of Neuromuscular Calf Stimulation and Intermittent Pneumatic Compression on Lower Limb Venous Hemodynamics

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression
Interventions
Device: Intermittent pneumatic compression, followed by neuromuscular stimulation
Device: Neuromuscular stimulation, followed by intermittent pneumatic compression
Registration Number
NCT01939288
Lead Sponsor
Imperial College London
Brief Summary

What is known?

* Disorders of peripheral circulation result in vascular morbidity and mortality

* Augmentation of peripheral circulation has been shown to be of benefit in both venous and arterial disease

* The benefit of intermittent pneumatic compression is clinically well evidenced.

* The use of intermittent pneumatic compression is limited by compliance issues related to sleeve application and external power source.

What new information will this trial contribute?

- This evaluates the haemodynamic effect of a new electrical device for augmentation of peripheral circulation

Detailed Description

RATIONALE - Enhancement of peripheral circulation has been shown to be of benefit in many vascular disorders, and the clinical effectiveness of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) is well established in peripheral vascular disease.

OBJECTIVE - This study aims to compare the haemodynamic efficacy of a novel neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) device with IPC in healthy subjects.

METHODS - 10 healthy volunteers will be randomised into two groups, in an interventional cross-over trial. Baseline measurements of haemodynamic velocity and flow will be taken, then subjects given bilateral therapy with each of the two devices in turn. Laser doppler fluximetry readings will be taken from the hand and foot. Baseline readings will be compared with readings taken after immediate cessation of therapy, and after 10 minutes. Tolerability will be measured using a verbal reported score.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group 2Intermittent pneumatic compression, followed by neuromuscular stimulationOther half of recruited subjects (n=5)
Group 1Neuromuscular stimulation, followed by intermittent pneumatic compressionHalf of recruited subjects (n=5)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
IPC(on) Peak Velocity Change From BaselineOne day

Ultrasound measurements of peak velocity. This is taken from the left leg superficial femoral vein and artery

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Academic Vascular Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital

🇬🇧

London, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath