COMPARISON OF DEBRIDEMENT, ANTIBIOTIC, IMPLANT RETENTION (DAIR) AND IMPLANT EXCHANGE IN EARLY-STAGE FRACTURE-RELATED INFECTIONS: A RETROSPECTİVE COHORT STUDY

Fracture-related infection remains one of the most challenging musculoskeletal complications in orthopedic trauma surgery. Its diagnosis is a multi-stage process based on various diagnostic criteria. The international consensus definition of fracture-related infection was standardized in 2018, and this definition has been reinforced with updates in subsequent years. The recently validated consensus definition of fracture-related infection offers clinicians the opportunity to standardize clinical reports and improve the quality of published literature. The consensus definition definitively indicates the presence of infection [confirmatory criteria; (1) fistula/sinus tract/incision site dehiscence, (2) purulent drainage during surgery, (3) growth of the same pathogen in ≥2 separate deep tissue/implant cultures] or possibly indicates the presence of infection [suggestive criteria; The diagnostic criteria are based on (1) local pain, redness, increased heat, (2) wound exudation, (3) fever, (4) elevated CRP and ESR, (5) implant loosening, osteolysis, non-union. The presence of suggestive criteria should raise suspicion of infection, and further investigation should be conducted. The presence of at least one confirmatory sign is associated with high diagnostic performance and is pathognomonic for the presence of fracture-related infection. This definition also guides the treatment of fracture-related infections. Fracture-related infections are a significant complication causing high morbidity in orthopedic trauma surgery. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of DAIR and implant removal/replacement methods used in the treatment of fracture-related infections, and to determine the infection-free fracture healing rates and the factors affecting treatment success.