MedPath

Targeted Dose Finding of Canakinumab (ACZ885) for Management of Acute Flare in Refractory or Contraindicated Gout Patients

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Acute Gout
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00798369
Lead Sponsor
Novartis
Brief Summary

This 8-week study is designed to determine the target dose of canakinumab (ACZ885) for the management of acute flare in gout patients who are contraindicated to Non-Steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or colchicine. The efficacy of ACZ885 will be compared to the corticosteroid triamcinolone acetonide.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • History of at least 1 gout flare prior to the Screening Visit
  • Meeting the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1977 preliminary criteria for the classification of acute arthritis of primary gout.
  • Presence of acute gout flare for no longer than 5 days.
  • Baseline pain intensity > or = to 50 mm on the 0-100 mm VAS.
  • Contraindicated for, intolerant or unresponsive to NSAIDs, colchicine or both.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Rheumatoid arthritis, evidence/suspicion of infectious/septic arthritis, or other acute inflammatory arthritis.
  • Presence of severe renal function impairment
  • Contraindication to intramuscular injection
  • Known presence or suspicion of active or recurrent bacterial, fungal or viral infection at the time of enrollment
  • Evidence of active pulmonary disease
  • Live vaccinations within 3 months prior to the start of the study
  • Use of forbidden therapy

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria applied

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Canakinumab 10 mgCanakinumabCanakinumab 10 mg subcutaneous (s.c) once. The s.c. injection could be administered into the arm or thigh. Randomized patients received one s.c. injection of canakinumab and placebo matching triamcinolone acetonide (0.9% sodium chloride) intramuscularly (i.m.) once, on Day 1. The i.m. injection was recommended to be administered deeply into the gluteal muscle.
Canakinumab 150 mgCanakinumabCanakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous (s.c) once. The s.c. injection could be administered into the arm or thigh. Randomized patients received one s.c. injection of canakinumab and placebo matching triamcinolone acetonide (0.9% sodium chloride) intramuscularly (i.m.) once, on Day 1. The i.m. injection was recommended to be administered deeply into the gluteal muscle.
Triamcinolone acetonide 40 mgTriamcinolone acetonideTriamcinolone acetonide 40 mg intramuscularly (i.m) once. The i.m. injection was recommended to be administered deeply into the gluteal muscle. Randomized patients received triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg i.m. once and placebo matching canakinumab s.c. once, on Day 1.
Canakinumab 50 mgCanakinumabCanakinumab 50 mg subcutaneous (s.c) once. The s.c. injection could be administered into the arm or thigh. Randomized patients received one s.c. injection of canakinumab and placebo matching triamcinolone acetonide (0.9% sodium chloride) intramuscularly (i.m.) once, on Day 1. The i.m. injection was recommended to be administered deeply into the gluteal muscle.
Canakinumab 25 mgCanakinumabCanakinumab 25 mg subcutaneous (s.c) once. The s.c. injection could be administered into the arm or thigh. Randomized patients received one s.c. injection of canakinumab and placebo matching triamcinolone acetonide (0.9% sodium chloride) intramuscularly (i.m.) once, on Day 1. The i.m. injection was recommended to be administered deeply into the gluteal muscle.
Canakinumab 90 mgCanakinumabCanakinumab 90 mg subcutaneous (s.c) once. The s.c. injection could be administered into the arm or thigh. Randomized patients received one s.c. injection of canakinumab and placebo matching triamcinolone acetonide (0.9% sodium chloride) intramuscularly (i.m.) once, on Day 1. The i.m. injection was recommended to be administered deeply into the gluteal muscle.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The Dose of Canakinumab for Treatment of Acute Flares in Gout Patients That Leads to the Same Efficacy as Triamcinolone Acetonide With Respect to Pain Intensity on a 0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)at 24,48 and 72 hours post-baseline

Mean target dose at 24, 48 and 72 hours. Four models: Emax, Logistic, Linear in log-dose, Linear were selected to describe the potential dose-response curve and hence estimate the target dose of canakinumab using baseline Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Body Mass Index (BMI) as covariates. Target dose was defined as the dose for which the efficacy is equivalent to the efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg and was identified by assessing the dose response relationship with regards to the pain intensity in the target joint measured on a 0- 100 mm VAS (0= no pain and 100= unbearable pain).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The Change in Pain Intensity in the Target Joint Following Canakinumab Administration Compared to Triamcinolone AcetonideBaseline,at 72 hrs post-dose and 7 days post-dose

The change in pain intensity from baseline to 72 hours and 7 days post dose as measured on a 0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale(VAS): 0= no pain and 100= severe pain. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment group, VAS at baseline and Body mass Index (BMI) at baseline as covariates. Change from baseline = (post-baseline measurement - baseline).

Percentage of Participants With an Excellent or Good Response With Regards to the Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatmentat 72 hours post-baseline

Participants scored their global assessment of response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Excellent, Good, Acceptable, Slight and Poor.

The Time to 50% Reduction of Baseline Pain Intensity in the Target JointBaseline, within 7 days after randomization

The median time in days to at least 50% reduction in Pain intensity from baseline as measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for each treatment group. Participants scored their pain intensity in the target joint on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100).

High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at 72 Hours, 7days, 4 Weeks and 8 Weeks Post Dose for Each Treatment Groupat 72 hours and 7 days, 4 and 8 weeks post-dose

High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was determined in serum at all visits (Visits 1-5) in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor response to treatment.

ANCOVA with treatment group, protein level at baseline and BMI at baseline as covariates.

Serum Amyloid Protein (SAA) Levels at 72 Hours, 7days, 4 Weeks and 8 Weeks Post Dose for Each Treatment Groupat 72 hours and 7 days, 4 and 8 weeks post-dose

Serum amyloid A (SAA) were determined in serum at all visits (Visits 1-5) in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor response to treatment.

ANCOVA with treatment group, protein level at baseline and BMI at baseline as covariates.

Amount of Rescue Medication Taken for Each Treatment Group7 days after study drug administration

Participants who had difficulty in tolerating their pain after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments and during the first 7 study days were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg prednisolone (or equivalent dose of prednisone \[30 mg\]) orally once a day for a maximum of 5 days. In addition, participants could use 500 mg acetaminophen (paracetamol) and/or 30 mg codeine as needed during the first 7 study days. A maximum of 1 g/dose or 3 g/day of acetaminophen and 30 mg/dose or 180 mg/day of codeine was allowed during the first 7 days of the study.

Trial Locations

Locations (29)

Montana Medical Research

🇺🇸

Missoula, Montana, United States

Northwest Clinical Trials

🇺🇸

Boise, Idaho, United States

Novartis Investigative Site

🇬🇧

Wellingborough, United Kingdom

Harbin Clinic

🇺🇸

Rome, Georgia, United States

Tampa Medical Group, P.A.

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

The Arthritis Center

🇺🇸

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Cotton O'Neil Clinic

🇺🇸

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Comprehensive Rheumatology

🇺🇸

Hendersonville, Tennessee, United States

Arthritis Consultants, Inc.

🇺🇸

St. Louis, Missouri, United States

San Diego Arthritis & Osteoporosis Medical Clinic

🇺🇸

San Diego, California, United States

Florida Medical Clinic, PA

🇺🇸

Zephyrhills, Florida, United States

Billings Clinic Research Center

🇺🇸

Billings, Montana, United States

Regional Clinical Research Rheumatology Assoc.

🇺🇸

Binghamton, New York, United States

Intermountain Orthopedics

🇺🇸

Boise, Idaho, United States

Novartis Investigative site

🇹🇷

Sihhiye/Ankara, Turkey

Pinnacle Research Group, LLC

🇺🇸

Anniston, Alabama, United States

Northern California Institute for Bone Health

🇺🇸

Oakland, California, United States

Southwest Rheumatology

🇺🇸

Mesquite, Texas, United States

University of Alabama at Birmingham

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Associated Pharmaceutical Research

🇺🇸

Buena Park, California, United States

Altoona Center for Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Inc.

🇺🇸

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Center for Clinical Trials of San Gabriel

🇺🇸

West Covina, California, United States

Arthritis and Diabetes Clinic

🇺🇸

Monroe, Louisiana, United States

Heartland Clinical Research, Inc.

🇺🇸

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Community Research Partners, Inc.

🇺🇸

Varnville, South Carolina, United States

MultiSpecialty Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Integrity Clinical Research, LLC

🇺🇸

Milan, Tennessee, United States

Health Research of Hampton Roads

🇺🇸

Newport News, Virginia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath