MedPath

Specified Drug-Use Survey of Trelagliptin Tablets "Survey on Long-term Use in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus"

Completed
Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT03555591
Lead Sponsor
Takeda
Brief Summary

The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of trelagliptin tablets in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the routine clinical setting.

Detailed Description

The drug being tested in this survey is called trelagliptin tablet. This tablet is being tested to treat people who have type 2 diabetes mellitus.

This survey is an observational (non-interventional) study and will look at the long-term safety and efficacy of the trelagliptin tablet in the routine clinical setting. The planned number of observed patients will be approximately 3000.

This multi-center observational trial will be conducted in Japan.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
3198
Inclusion Criteria
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Have severe ketosis, diabetic coma or precoma, or type 1 diabetes mellitus
  2. Have severe infection, perioperative status, or serious trauma
  3. Have severe renal impairment or on dialysis due to end-stage renal disease
  4. Have a history of hypersensitivity to any ingredients of this drug

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Trelagliptin 100 mgTrelagliptinTrelagliptin 100 mg tablet, orally, once weekly for up to 36 months. Participants received interventions as part of routine medical care.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Events36 months

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

Number of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Drug Reactions36 months

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change From Baseline in Mean Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)

The reported data was the change in the mean value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected between baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood GlucoseBaseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)

The reported data was the change in the mean value of fasting blood glucose collected between baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Percentage of Participants Achieving Good Glycemic Control (Reduction in HbA1c Values < 7.0 Percent)Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)

The reported data was percentage of participants who achieved good glycemic control (defined as reduction in HbA1c values \< 7.0 Percent) at baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36).

Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beat-cell Function (HOMA-beta)Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)

The reported data was the change in the mean value of HOMA-beta. HOMA-beta measures as following; HOMA-beta = fasting insulin (microU/mL) ×360/ \[fasting glucose (mg/dL) - 63\].

Percentage of Participants Achieving Good Glycemic Control (Reduction in HbA1c Values < 8.0 Percent)Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)

The reported data was percentage of participants who achieved good glycemic control (defined as reduction in HbA1c values \< 8.0 Percent) at baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36).

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin LevelBaseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)

The reported data was the change in the mean value of fasting insulin level collected between baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36).

Change From Baseline in Fasting GlucagonBaseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)

The reported data was the change in the mean value of fasting glucagon collected between baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36).

Percentage of Participants Achieving Good Glycemic Control (Reduction in HbA1c Values < 6.0 Percent)Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)

The reported data was percentage of participants who achieved good glycemic control (defined as reduction in HbA1c values \< 6.0 Percent) at baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Takeda Selected Site

🇯🇵

Tokyo, Japan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath