跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00133835
NCT00133835已完成1 期

Comparison of ESWL Alone and ESWL Combined With Endoscopic Drainage of the Main Pancreatic Duct for Painful Chronic Pancreatitis

Erasme University Hospital4 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 1998年3月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
1 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
4
主要终点
Relapse of pain at 2 years

研究概览

简要总结

Endoscopy is an established method of treatment for painful obstructive calcified pancreatitis. It involves the disintegration of calcifications using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) followed by endoscopic removal of stone fragments possibly associated with stent insertion. A pilot study suggests that ESWL alone relieves pain in calcified chronic pancreatitis (CP). The aim of this study is to compare both techniques in a randomized controlled trial.

详细描述

Endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct is an established method of treatment of painful obstructive calcified chronic pancreatitis (CP). It involves disintegration of calcifications using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) followed by endoscopic removal of stone fragments, possibly associated with stent insertion. A pilot study suggests that ESWL alone in calcified CP is followed by spontaneous elimination of stone fragments and pain relief, without sphincterotomy. After ESWL alone, the exocrine function was found to return to normal values in some cases. Potential benefits include lower costs and morbidity as well as wider availability compared to endoscopic techniques.

The primary outcome of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the relapse of pain at 2 years after treatment with ESWL alone or endoscopic treatment, consisting of ESWL followed by endoscopic stone extraction. Secondary outcomes include a comparison of technical results (as assessed by abdominal CT Scan 1 week after the last intervention and secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance at 1 month), complication rates, and treatment-related costs in both groups.

Patients are eligible to participate in the study according to the following criteria:

Inclusion criteria :

  • painful chronic pancreatitis (abdominal pain attack during the preceding 12 months);
  • at least 1 calcified stone greater than 4 mm in one of its axes in the cephalic or corporeal portion of the main pancreatic duct with upstream duct dilation;
  • written informed consent obtained from the patient.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Painful chronic pancreatitis (>1 abdominal pain attack during the preceding 12 months)
  • At least 1 calcified stone greater than 4 mm in one of its axes in the cephalic or corporeal portion of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) with upstream duct dilation
  • Written informed consent obtained from the patient

排除标准

  • History of treatment of the pancreas using ESWL, endoscopy, or surgery
  • Pancreatic collection greater than 2 cm in diameter at magnetic resonance or CT scan
  • Alkaline phosphatase levels greater than twice the upper limit of normal values or signs of cholangitis
  • Age below 18 years
  • Pregnancy or lactation

结局指标

主要结局

Relapse of pain at 2 years

次要结局

  • Complication rate at 1 month
  • Diameter of the main pancreatic duct at 1 month
  • Treatment-related costs of initial intervention and during follow-up

研究者

发起方
Erasme University Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验