跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07064980
NCT07064980已完成不适用

Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Severe Acute Cholangitis Caused by Common Bile Duct Stones

Wuhan Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 126 人开始时间: 2021年5月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
126
试验地点
1
主要终点
Length of Hospital Stay

研究概览

简要总结

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for the treatment of severe acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones. The primary goal is to determine which emergency drainage procedure leads to faster patient recovery, specifically by evaluating the length of hospital stay, without increasing complication rates.

详细描述

Severe acute cholangitis (AC) due to common bile duct stones is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent biliary decompression. While both ERCP and PTBD are established minimally invasive options, the optimal choice remains under discussion. This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare these two interventions. A total of 126 patients with severe AC (Tokyo Guidelines 2018 Grade II or III) were randomized to either the ERCP group (n=63) or the PTBD group (n=63). Randomization was performed using a computer-generated sequence with concealed allocation. While operators could not be blinded, outcome assessors and data analysts were. The study hypothesis is that ERCP, as a more direct route for potential stone removal and drainage, may facilitate a quicker overall recovery compared to PTBD. The trial evaluates procedural outcomes, recovery metrics, therapeutic efficacy, inflammatory markers, and safety profiles to provide evidence for clinical decision-making.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients who met the diagnostic criteria for acute cholangitis according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18), and were diagnosed through physical examination, ultrasound, CT, or MRCP showing common bile duct stones as the cause of obstruction.
  • Body temperature <36°C or >38°C.
  • Presence of jaundice or signs of organ dysfunction (e.g., hypotension responsive to fluids for Grade II, or requiring vasopressors for Grade III, altered mental status, etc.).
  • Patients who signed informed consent.

排除标准

  • Patients with concurrent diseases such as gastric perforation or active gastrointestinal bleeding unrelated to cholangitis.
  • Patients with acute pancreatitis as the primary diagnosis.
  • Patients with serious primary diseases in the heart, brain, lungs, kidneys, hematopoietic, or nervous systems contraindicating either procedure.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Patients with cognitive dysfunction unable to provide consent.
  • Known pancreatobiliary malignancy as the cause of obstruction.
  • Severe liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh C) or liver atrophy.
  • Patients with severe systemic primary diseases, who could not tolerate the anesthesia or procedure.
  • Patients with mental disorders, hematologic diseases (e.g., severe coagulopathy uncorrectable pre-procedure), autoimmune diseases directly impacting biliary system, or those using high-dose corticosteroids affecting inflammatory markers.
  • Patients participating in other clinical drug trials.
  • Previous ERCP or PTBD for the current episode of cholangitis.

结局指标

主要结局

Length of Hospital Stay

时间窗: At hospital discharge (up to approximately 3-4 weeks post-procedure).

The total number of days from hospital admission to discharge.

次要结局

  • Time to First Ambulation(From date of procedure until hospital discharge (estimated maximum of 4 weeks).)
  • Procedure Time(Measured intraoperatively)
  • Time to Return of Bowel Function(From date of procedure until hospital discharge (estimated maximum of 4 weeks).)
  • Therapeutic Efficacy(Assessed at 24 hours post-procedure.)
  • Change in Inflammatory Markers(Baseline (pre-treatment), 72 hours post-procedure, and 3 months post-treatment.)
  • Change in Pain Intensity(Baseline (pre-treatment), 72 hours post-procedure, and 3 months post-treatment.)
  • Incidence of Complications(up to 3 months post-procedure.)

研究者

发起方
Wuhan Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Liping Zhu

Principal Investigator

Wuhan Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验