MedPath

PRP Therapy to m. Gluteus Medius During THA

Not Applicable
Conditions
Hip Osteoarthritis
Interventions
Biological: PRP
Other: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT02607462
Lead Sponsor
Satakunta Central Hospital
Brief Summary

Study purpose is to evaluate perioperative usefulness of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. The study is designed as a randomized double blinded study using saline as placebo. The measurement outcomes includes objective variables (MRI, dynamometer) as well as subjective measurements (Oxford Hip Score, Harris Hip Score).

Patients are assigned to two different groups, according to a randomization list. PRP (approximately 9ml from which 1ml is delivered to in-house laboratory for the measurement of platelet count) is obtained from venous blood and applied to m. gluteus medius during the closure of modified lateral approach (Hardinge).

Study participants are evaluated preoperatively by trained physiotherapist. After surgery, participants undergo clinical evaluation and imaged (MRI) at 3 and 12 months post-operative. In the same time points, strength, Harris Hip Score and Oxford Hip Score. At the end of the study, the nature of the injected substance is revealed to the patients.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  • Clinically and radiology confirmed arthritis which treatment is total hip arthroplasty.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Revision surgery, insulin dependent diabetes and other endocrinology disease, smoking, use of per os cortisone, malignancy, rheumatoid arthritis, any autoimmune disease, alcoholist, previous fracture to hip, patients with diagnosed mental illness, absolute contraindications for MRI study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PRPPRPPlatelet-rich plasma taken made from centrifuged venous blood.
SalinePlaceboSodium chloride 0.9% used as placebo.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The decrease of T2 weighted signaling between PRP and placebo groupChange from 3 months at 12 months

Quantitative method of tissue healing

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Differences in Harris Hip Score points between PRP and placebo groupChange from 3 months at 12 months

Quality method of post-operative healing

Comparison of hip abduction strengths between PRP and placebo group using dynamometerChange from 3 months at 12 months

Quantitive method of abduction strengths

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Satakunta Central Hospital

🇫🇮

Pori, Finland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath