PRP Therapy to m. Gluteus Medius During THA
- Conditions
- Hip Osteoarthritis
- Interventions
- Biological: PRPOther: Placebo
- Registration Number
- NCT02607462
- Lead Sponsor
- Satakunta Central Hospital
- Brief Summary
Study purpose is to evaluate perioperative usefulness of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. The study is designed as a randomized double blinded study using saline as placebo. The measurement outcomes includes objective variables (MRI, dynamometer) as well as subjective measurements (Oxford Hip Score, Harris Hip Score).
Patients are assigned to two different groups, according to a randomization list. PRP (approximately 9ml from which 1ml is delivered to in-house laboratory for the measurement of platelet count) is obtained from venous blood and applied to m. gluteus medius during the closure of modified lateral approach (Hardinge).
Study participants are evaluated preoperatively by trained physiotherapist. After surgery, participants undergo clinical evaluation and imaged (MRI) at 3 and 12 months post-operative. In the same time points, strength, Harris Hip Score and Oxford Hip Score. At the end of the study, the nature of the injected substance is revealed to the patients.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 80
- Clinically and radiology confirmed arthritis which treatment is total hip arthroplasty.
- Revision surgery, insulin dependent diabetes and other endocrinology disease, smoking, use of per os cortisone, malignancy, rheumatoid arthritis, any autoimmune disease, alcoholist, previous fracture to hip, patients with diagnosed mental illness, absolute contraindications for MRI study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description PRP PRP Platelet-rich plasma taken made from centrifuged venous blood. Saline Placebo Sodium chloride 0.9% used as placebo.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The decrease of T2 weighted signaling between PRP and placebo group Change from 3 months at 12 months Quantitative method of tissue healing
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Differences in Harris Hip Score points between PRP and placebo group Change from 3 months at 12 months Quality method of post-operative healing
Comparison of hip abduction strengths between PRP and placebo group using dynamometer Change from 3 months at 12 months Quantitive method of abduction strengths
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Satakunta Central Hospital
🇫🇮Pori, Finland