Biotivity A-C Membrane Socket Preservation Study

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Alveolar Ridge Preservation

• Registration Number: NCT07091448
• Lead Sponsor: University of Maryland, Baltimore

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, randomized controlled pilot clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a human placental-derived amnion chorion membrane (Biotivity™ A/C Plus Membrane) versus a conventional collagen membrane in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) following atraumatic extraction of single posterior teeth. A total of 12 subjects will be enrolled at the University of Maryland School of Dentistry. The study aims to assess both soft tissue wound healing and hard/soft tissue dimensional changes over a 5-month period prior to dental implant placement.

Throughout the approximately 6-month study duration, participants will undergo oral exams, x-rays, surgical procedures, and follow-up visits. All participants will undergo routine tooth extraction, bone graft material and barrier placement, and dental implant placement.

Participation in the study is voluntary, and the alternative is to continue routine dental care. Risks include minor discomfort from procedures such as tooth extraction and implant placement. The major benefit of participation in the study is the preservation of jaw dimensions following extraction, which will simplify the placement of a dental implant.

Detailed Description

This randomized, controlled, parallel-arm clinical study investigates the use of Biotivity™ A/C Plus Membrane, a bioactive human amnion chorion-derived barrier membrane, in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) of Type I or II extraction sockets. Subjects will be randomized to receive either the investigational amnion chorion membrane or a conventional collagen membrane (CopiOs Extend) over cancellous allograft (Puros®) after flapless tooth extraction in the premolar or molar region (excluding third molars).

The study will evaluate:

Primary outcome: soft tissue wound healing over 5 months using standardized wound healing indices.

Secondary outcomes: hard and soft tissue dimensional changes using CBCT and intraoral scanning, histologic evaluation of new bone formation, and implant placement feasibility.

Subjects will be followed across nine visits, including baseline (screening), ARP surgery, post-operative evaluations at multiple time points, and re-entry for implant placement at 5 months. The final implant-supported restoration will be delivered after implant integration, with continued follow-up for histologic and radiographic outcomes.

This study aims to determine whether the amnion chorion membrane provides superior soft tissue healing and volumetric bone preservation compared to conventional membranes in ARP procedures, with the goal of improving clinical outcomes in implant dentistry.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2025-06-24
• Status Verified: 2025-07
• Study First Submitted QC: 2025-07-21
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-07-21
• Study First Posted: 2025-07-29
• Last Update Posted: 2025-07-29
• Study Start: 2025-11-01
• Primary Completion: 2026-10-31
• Study Completion: 2027-10-31

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 12

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Soft Tissue Wound Healing Score Using Wound Healing Indices	Over the course of the study (From the time of study enrollment Alveolar Ridge Preservation [Visit 2] to 5-month dental implant placement [Visit6].	Wound healing will be assessed during post-surgery follow-up visits using the Early Wound Healing Index (Wachtel et al., 2003), which classifies flap closure into five categories (1 = complete closure, no fibrin; 5 = necrosis), and Wound Healing Index (WHI) described by Huang (2025 ) with three categories (1 = uneventful healing with no gingival edema, erythema, suppuration, patient dis-comfort, or flap dehiscence; 2 = uneventful healing with slight gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort, or flap dehiscence, but no suppuration; 3 = poor wound healing with significant gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort, flap dehiscence, or any suppuration.) Scores will be assigned by a blinded examiner. Data will be reported as the number of participants per score category and the median EHI score per treatment group.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Radiographic measurement of Mean Change at 4 Months Measured by CBCT	Over the course of the study (4 months, From the time of study enrollment Alveolar Ridge Preservation [Visit 2] to 6-month dental implant placement [Visit 9]).	Vertical and volumetric changes in alveolar ridge dimensions will be assessed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) taken at baseline (post-extraction) and 4 months after alveolar ridge preservation.; Vertical bone height will be measured at the mid-buccal point from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar crest.; Volumetric bone change will be calculated at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm apical to the alveolar crest using cross-sectional slices and 3D analysis software (Geomagic Control X).; Data will be reported as mean change (mm for height; mm³ for volume) and standard deviation per group.
Soft Tissue Change from Baseline to 4 Months Using Intraoral Scans	Over the course of the study (4 months, From the time of study enrollment Alveolar Ridge Preservation [Visit 2] to 6-month dental implant placement [Visit 9]).	Buccal soft tissue thickness will be evaluated using superimposed STL files obtained from intraoral digital scans. Scans will be collected at baseline, immediate post-surgery and 4 month post-surgery. Thickness will be measured at the mid-buccal point of the site, and changes will be reported as mean (mm) per group.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Maryland School of Dentistry; 🇺🇸 Baltimore, Maryland, United States