Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03206723
NCT03206723UnknownPhase 2

Bandage Contact Lenses to Decrease Pain and Improve Healing in Emergency Department Subjects Presenting With Corneal Abrasions

Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2017Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Pain scale

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Two percent of all patients presenting to the Emergency Departments have complaints involving the eye. Corneal abrasions are a common diagnosis with patients with eye pain and often cause significant discomfort. Current treatment includes a thorough evaluation of the eye followed by patching, empiric antibiotics, cycloplegics and oral pain medicines. This study will be a randomized controlled trial to determine the safety and efficacy of BCLs. It will involve the initial patient evaluation followed by a return visit to the Emergency Department within 36 hours for re-examination. At each visit, the patient will be assessed for the size and location of the abrasion along with their report of pain using a visual analog scale. Data will be recorded on a standard data collection sheet. Telephone contact will be made at 30 days to ensure resolution of abrasion and that no complications ensued.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects between ages 18-65 years who present to the emergency department.
  • Traumatic corneal abrasion not associated with contact lens use or communicating or adjacent wounds to the eye.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant women
  • Breast-feeding women
  • Corneal abrasion associated with the wearing contact lenses
  • Evidence of corneal ulcer, glaucoma or other ocular pathology, monocular vision
  • Wound healing deficits such as collagen vascular disease or concomitant steroid use
  • Use of other ocular medications, dry eyes, blepharitis
  • Systemic infections
  • Known allergies to medicines used in the study

Arms & Interventions

Group 1

Active Comparator
  1. Standard care

Intervention: Eyedrop (Drug)

Group 1

Active Comparator
  1. Standard care

Intervention: Hydrocodone (Drug)

Group 2

Active Comparator
  1. Standard care
  2. Bandage contact lens

Intervention: Bandage contact lens (Device)

Group 2

Active Comparator
  1. Standard care
  2. Bandage contact lens

Intervention: Eyedrop (Drug)

Group 2

Active Comparator
  1. Standard care
  2. Bandage contact lens

Intervention: Hydrocodone (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain scale

Time Frame: 24 hours post treatment

The pain difference using Visual Analogue Scale

Secondary Outcomes

  • Corneal defect size(24 hours post treatment)
  • Pain medication needed(24 hours post treatment)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

David Tanen

Professor of Clinical X

Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials