Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guided by AED vs Telephone-assistance
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Sponsor
- Bionorte
- Enrollment
- 42
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitations strated
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this research is to evaluate and to compare the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among untrained laypeople under two different scenarios: automated external defibrillator (AED) guided CPR or dispatcher-assisted CPR. Secondarily, to evaluate the quality of the dispatcher-assisted instructions provided from the emergency call center.
Detailed Description
A simulation study will beperformed. 42 volunteers selected by non-probabilistic sampling will be randomized in two scenarios of cardiac arrest on mannequin: (A) AED-guided CPR and (T) dispatcher-assisted CPR. Simulations last 9 minutes. The quality of CPR will be evaluated by metric monitoring of the chest compressions and timing of actions. A peer's content analysis of the telephone instructions will be performed using a checklist.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •untrained laypeople
- •Volunteers
Exclusion Criteria
- •Pregnants, leg/arm injuried people, chronic back pain.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Cardiopulmonary resuscitations strated
Time Frame: 9 minutes
nº of CPR strated by bystander
Secondary Outcomes
- Hands on chest(9 minutes)
- Chest compressions rate(9 minutes)
- Chest compressions depth/recoil(9 minutes)
- Time under CPR(8 minutes)