Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02977871
NCT02977871CompletedNot Applicable

A Randomized Trial Comparing Bladder Flap Versus Omission of Flap During Cesarean Section of Primiparous Women

Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital1 site in 1 country201 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2016Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
201
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Total operation time

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed on women. Over the years minor variations of each surgical step have been introduced, and cesarean sections are not standardized and many different techniques are employed during surgery. Creation of a bladder flap has been an integral surgical step of the cesarean section for many years. The role of the bladder flap and its usefulness in cesarean section is not known well. Further, in some cases the bladder flap is omitted during cesarean section. The aim of the current study is to compare operating time and postoperative urinary symptoms in cesarean sections using either bladder flap or omission of flap.

Detailed Description

Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed on women. The main aspects of the surgical approach to low-transverse cesarean delivery have not changed much since1926. Over the years minor variations of each surgical step have been introduced, and cesarean sections are not standardized and many different techniques are employed during surgery. Creation of a bladder flap has been an integral surgical step of the cesarean section for many years. The evidence on the role of the bladder flap and its usefulness in cesarean section is very limited. In emergent cesarean sections where rapid delivery is the main goal, the bladder flap is usually omitted. Literature about the usefulness of a bladder flap is limited and more randomized studies are needed. Most of the study outcomes were focusing operating time however, the investigator in the current study additional focused on postoperative urinary symptoms and dynamics. The aim of the current study is to compare operating time and postoperative urinary symptoms in cesarean sections using either bladder flap or omission of flap.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 40 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •primiparous women >37 weeks without high-risk pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria

  • •presence of microbiologically confirmed urinary tract infection before delivery, twin pregnancies, cervical dilatation at admission ≥4 cm, estimated fetal weight>4000 gr, history of previous abdominal surgery

Arms & Interventions

No Bladder Flap group

No Intervention

Routine uterine incision performed during cesarean section without incision and dissection of the bladder peritoneum.

Bladder Flap group

Active Comparator

Routine uterine incision performed during cesarean section with an incision and a dissection of a bladder flap.

Intervention: Bladder flap (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Total operation time

Time Frame: 1 hour

Total operation time from skin incision to the end of operation

Secondary Outcomes

  • Bladder injury(up to 48 hour)
  • Urinary retention(up to 48 hour)
  • Estimated blood loss(1 hour)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Berna Aslan Cetin

Attending Physician, ObGyn

Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials