跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/06/068414
CTRI/2024/06/068414尚未招募1/2 期

Added Effect of Whole Body Vibration versus Focal Vibration along with Conventional Exercises on Balance in Older Adults

MAEERs College of Physiotherapy Talegaon Dabhade1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2024年6月10日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
1/2 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
40
试验地点
1
主要终点
POMA (Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment)

研究概览

简要总结

Background:  As the part of the aging process older adults show decline in various physiological systems of the body. The age related decline in Nervous system cause anatomical changes in the brain which result in neuronal loss. Pacinian corpuscles, which sense the vibratory stimuli, decrease in density with advancing age. This results in balance impairment, loss of muscle strength, muscle endurance and power, loss of mobility, cognitive decline, decrease aerobic capacity, decline in visual acuity, decrease touch sensation and vestibular dysfunction. Therefore, improving balance and thereby enhancing the quality of life in older adults forms an integral part of a rehabilitation program. The Conventional exercise program mainly focuses on the muscle strength, power, endurance and flexibility for balance improvement in older adults. The WBV training is one in which mechanical vibrations are transmitted from the feet to the rest of the body using a vibrating platform for 3 min with 1 min of interval between each repetition for 3 repetitions. Focal Vibration is a hand held device or wearable device which uses frequency of 100 Hz. The effective time required for focal vibration to have an effect is 40s to 3 min bilaterally on each muscle. 3 major muscles of the lower limb are targeted– Quadriceps, Tibialis Anterior and Gastrocnemius which thereby helps in improving balance. So the purpose of this study is to compare WBV with FV and to assess which exercise program is more effective in improving balance in older adults.

 Material and Methods:  In this study 40 participants will be selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. With purposive sampling participants will be divided into two groups, Group A and Group B. Group A will be given WBV along with conventional exercise 3 times a week for 6 weeks. Group B will be given FV along with conventional exercise 3 times a week for 6 weeks. Pre and Post intervention assessment of static balance will be taken by Functional Reach Test and dynamic balance by using POMA scale.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
65.00 Year(s) 至 75.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Young old adults with age group of 65-75 years, male or female (1, 18).
  • Normal general cognition (MMSE ≥ 24).
  • Mild to moderate risk of fall.
  • Able to walk 10m independently with or without use of assistive device.

排除标准

  • High risk of fall (BBS ≤ 20).
  • Any musculoskeletal injury, pain or deformity in the lower limb; acute upper limb conditions.
  • Any cardiac conditions or neurological conditions affecting balance.
  • Presence of uncontrolled Hypertension and Diabetes.
  • Presence of Vestibular dysfunction.

结局指标

主要结局

POMA (Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment)

时间窗: 6 Weeks

次要结局

  • NA(NA)

研究者

发起方
MAEERs College of Physiotherapy Talegaon Dabhade
申办方类型
Private medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Madhuri Rajbhar

MAEERs College of Physiotherapy, Talegaon Dabhade

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验