Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03713710
NCT03713710
Completed
Not Applicable

Self-Sampling for HPV Testing in African American Women - Mississippi Delta

University of Alabama at Birmingham1 site in 1 country335 target enrollmentNovember 28, 2016
ConditionsCervical Cancer

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cervical Cancer
Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Enrollment
335
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
adherence to cervical cancer screening
Status
Completed
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy and costs of this patient-centered approach ("Choice" between two cervical cancer screening modalities) in adherence to cervical cancer screening as compared to the current standard of care within the public health system in Mississippi (Pap test at the local department -"Pap") among un/under-screened African American women in the Mississippi Delta using a theory-based, culturally relevant intervention implemented by Peer Health Educators (PHEs).

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to examine the efficacy and costs of a patient-centered approach ("Choice" between self-sampling and Pap test) in adherence to cervical cancer screening as compared to Pap test at the local health department ("Pap") among un/under-screened African American women in the Mississippi Delta. HYPOTHESES: Women in the "Choice" arm will have a higher cervical cancer screening adherence as well as higher satisfaction than women assigned to the "Pap" arm; (2) Within the "Choice" arm, more women will choose and complete self-sampling than Pap test; and (3) The "Choice" intervention will be on average less costly and more cost-effective than the "Pap" intervention. SPECIFIC AIMS: (1) To compare the impact of these two intervention approaches, "Choice" versus "Pap", on cervical cancer screening adherence through a group randomized controlled trial; (2) To compare patient satisfaction between the two intervention approaches; and (3) To compare the costs and cost-effectiveness of these two intervention approaches, "Choice" versus "Pap". STUDY DESIGN: 12 towns will be randomized to either "Choice" or "Pap" (180 women/arm). Peer Health Educators (PHEs) will identify African American women who report not having undergone cervical cancer screening in the past three years and deliver a brief theory-based, cultural relevant educational session on cervical cancer and screening using a door-to-door approach. Women randomized to the "Pap" arm will be provided with information on how to schedule an appointment at the local health department. Women randomized to the "Choice" arm will be given the choice of attending the health department for a Pap test or self-collecting their own sample at home to be sent for HPV testing. PHEs will follow-up with women in either arm who have a positive test in order to assure diagnostic evaluation and care.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 28, 2016
End Date
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Isabel Scarinci

Primary Investigator

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • no personal history of cervical cancer
  • not have engaged in cervical cancer screening in the past four years

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

adherence to cervical cancer screening

Time Frame: baseline to 30 days

adherence to cerivcal cancer screening by attending the Pap testing or returning the self-collected sample for HPV testing

Secondary Outcomes

  • Satisfaction with the intervention(baseline to 6 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials