Comparison of Community Reintegration Interventions When Using a Simulated Environment
- Conditions
- Simulated Environments for Community Reintegration
- Registration Number
- NCT06646939
- Lead Sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- Brief Summary
The investigators believe that rehabilitation specialists will use community reintegration treatments more if a simulated environment is available.
- Detailed Description
Community reintegration training has always been a significant aspect of inpatient rehabilitation recovery. Community reintegration training involved therapists and patients going into the actual community to evaluate and practice their functional tasks such as negotiating curbs, crosswalks, or marketplaces. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this option was not available. The absence of this intervention made it challenging for therapists to evaluate a patient's safety to return home. Creating a simulated environment within the inpatient rehabilitation department became an alternative to taking patients to an outside environment. Saji, et al. (2015) demonstrated that utilization of a simulated environment enhanced functional improvements of post-acute stroke patients at 12 convalescent rehabilitation wards. New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center (NYP- WCMC) has constructed a simulated environment for the purposes of enhancing community reintegration training. This project will test its use and efficacy.
The availability of this simulated environment may be more time-efficient and safer than community reintegration training outside of the department or hospital. Training in the simulated environment may improve the functional ability of individuals undergoing inpatient rehabilitation, in accordance with the degree of use of the simulated environment. Greater use of the simulated environment may predict greater functional improvements. This study will collect pilot data about functional outcomes and patient perspectives about their balance confidence, their ability to perform functional tasks, and the efficacy of the use of simulated environment for community reintegration. This pilot data will seed a future efficacy study with a comparison group.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- Medical records of patients admitted to the IRU from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019 will be queried for number of minutes billed for Community Integration.
- Medical records of patients admitted to the IRU from April 2
- Patients admitted to the Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit (IRU) of at least 18 years of age and older
- Patients who can read and provide informed consent in English.
- Patients who will be discharged to home after inpatient rehabilitation.
- Patients who are ambulatory with a minimal QI score of 3 on "Walk 10 feet".
- Patients who utilized the simulated environment during their inpatient stay.
- Patients who score 8 or greater on the BIMS on initial evaluation.
- The investigators will exclude medical records of patients admitted to the IRU from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021 because of the COVID restrictions that were in place.
- Patients who are less than 18 years of age.
- Patients who are not ambulatory due to medical reasons.
- Patients who cannot read and provide informed consent in English.
- Patients who were discharged to acute care, skilled nursing facility or long-term care facility after their inpatient rehabilitation stay.
- Patients who did not use the simulated environment during their inpatient stay.
- Patients who score 7 or lower on the BIMS on initial evaluation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Utilization of community reintegration, as measured by number of 15-minute units billed Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 9753, is a billing code where one unit of the code is used for each 15 minutes the provider spends with the patient teaching them return to work and the community.
For this measure, the therapist will document the amount of time spent performing each study activity when utilizing the simulated environment, as measured by number of 15-minute units billed..
This will be compared to units billed in 2015 - 2019 prior to the implementation of the simulated environment for this study.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quality Indicators Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days Qualitative assessment by the therapist of car transfer
Gait Speed Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days Meters/second
Activities Specific Balance Confidence Scale Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale is scored by adding up the ratings for each item and dividing by 16, the total number of items.
The scale uses a range of 0-100%, with 0 representing no confidence and 100 representing complete confidence.
The resulting score indicates the participant's overall balance confidence. 80% or higher: The participant has a high level of physical functioning and is at low risk for falls 50-80%: The participant has a moderate level of physical functioning Less than 50%: The participant has a low level of physical functioning and is at a high risk of falling Less than 67%: The participant has a substantial risk of fallingPatient satisfaction 30 days post discharge Likert scale, with a low score of 1 and a high score of 5.
Length of Stay Duration of IRU stay, an average of 11 days Days
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
NewYork Presbyterian Hospital Baker Pavilion
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States