The exploration of the differences between two surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty, direct anterior minimal invasive surgery and Hardinge’s approach, in obese and non-obese hip osteoarthritic patients
- Conditions
- Hip osteoarthritisMusculoskeletal Diseases
- Registration Number
- ISRCTN15066737
- Lead Sponsor
- niversity of West Attica
- Brief Summary
2020 Interim results article in https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2542-3975.288781 Results for direct anterior approach–minimally invasive surgery in obese and non-obese patients (added 03/09/2021) 2021 Results article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34888148/ (added 13/12/2021)
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
1. Age >50 years
2. Symptomatic and radiographically con?rmed hip OA
3. All participants must be ambulatory before surgery
4. Willing to be assigned to the study
1. Dementia, chronic respiratory disease, chronic renal failure, heart failure, neurological disorder, undergoing chemotherapy, and previous osteotomy or arthroscopy to the involved hip
2. In addition, after enrolment, patients will be excluded if they present postoperative complications that might prevent them from receiving the standardized postoperative physiotherapy intervention
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Measured preoperatively (baseline), at the end of the 4th and 8th postoperative week:<br>1. Pain levels evaluated using the Face Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R)<br>2. Functionality measured with the Greek version of the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS-Gr) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test<br>3. Quality of life evaluated using the Greek version of the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 items (i-HOT12-Gr)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method There are no secondary outcome measures