Evaluation of Standard and Robot Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Bicrucatie Retaining Prosthesis
- Conditions
- Osteo Arthritis Knee
- Interventions
- Procedure: Total Knee Prosthesis - type Bicruciate retainingProcedure: Robot-assisted Total Knee ArthroplastyProcedure: Total Knee Prosthesis - type Posterior Stabilized
- Registration Number
- NCT04334304
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Ghent
- Brief Summary
The first study goal is to compare the outcomes between Posterior Stabilized and Bicruciate Retaining TKA. Additionally, the second goal is to evaluate the effect of robot assisted surgery in both Posterior Stabilized and Bicruciate Retaining TKA.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 47
- End stage osteoarthritis of the knee joint with failed conservative treatment
- Previous ligament trauma
- Previous fracture of femur or tibia
- Fixed flexion contracture > 10°
- Flexion < 110°
- Coronal deformity > 15°
- Previous infection of the knee joint
- Ligament insufficiency
- Neurologic conditions
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Bicruciate retaining TKA with robot-assistance Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty A TKA procedure will carried out: Bicruciate retaining TKA with robot-assistance Posterior Stabilized with robot-assistance Total Knee Prosthesis - type Posterior Stabilized A TKA procedure will carried out: Posterior Stabilized TKA with robot-assistance Bicruciate retaining TKA with robot-assistance Total Knee Prosthesis - type Bicruciate retaining A TKA procedure will carried out: Bicruciate retaining TKA with robot-assistance Posterior Stabilized with robot-assistance Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty A TKA procedure will carried out: Posterior Stabilized TKA with robot-assistance Bicruciate retaining TKA without robot-assistance Total Knee Prosthesis - type Bicruciate retaining A TKA procedure will carried out: Bicruciate retaining TKA without robot-assistance Posterior Stabilized TKA without robot-assistance Total Knee Prosthesis - type Posterior Stabilized A TKA procedure will carried out: Posterior Stabilized TKA without robot-assistance
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient reported outcome measures Preoperative The following patient reported outcome measures will be evaluated: Pain Catastrophizing Scale. The score is a percentage score from 0 to 52, 0 representing no problems and 52 representing extreme problems.
Change in patient reported outcome measures Postoperatively at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. The change for the following patient reported outcome measures will be evaluated (compared to preoperatively): Pain Catastrophizing Scale. The score is a percentage score from 0 to 52, 0 representing no problems and 100 representing extreme problems.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Alignment Preoperative and postoperatively at 6 weeks and 6 months. Coronal alignment on xrays. The lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) will be evaluated. This is the angle between the mechanical femoral axis and the line between the distal articular surface of the femur. Additionally the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) will be evaluated. This is the line between the condylar surface and the mechanical axis of the tibia on a coronal radiograph.
Knee kinematics in 3D after squat, knee flexion/extension, stair ascend and descend. Postoperatively at 1 year. Knee kinematics in 3D obtained with fluoroscopy. Patients will be asked to perform squats, a flexion/extension movement, ascend and descend stairs. 3D motion of the prosthesis components can be obtained by projecting the 3D file of the prosthesis components onto the fluoroscopy images.
Knee laxity Preoperative and postoperatively at 1 year. Sagittal knee laxity will be evaluated with stress examination. Sagittal knee laxity will be measured with an AP laxitymeter (GENOUROB; CE Marked). With a standardized setup, anteroposterior laxity can be obtained by measuring the anteroposterior deviation from the neutral position with up to 300N of force.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ghent University Hospital
🇧🇪Ghent, Belgium