A Pilot Study to Investigate the Feasibility of Conducting a Randomized Controlled Trial That Compares Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair for Treatment of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 29
- 试验地点
- 4
- 主要终点
- Feasibility to recruit patients: Number of eligible patients that sign the informed consent
研究概览
简要总结
Currently, most patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury undergo surgery. There is a general belief that surgical reconstruction is necessary to return to sport safely and to limit premature knee osteoarthrosis or additional meniscal damage. However, there is unsufficient scientific evidence for this belief. Moreover, several studies show that a reconstruction does not guarantee successful return to sports or the prevention of osteoarthritis or meniscal injuries at all. Therefore, an immediate surgery after an ACL injury is more and more questioned. The only qualitative RCT that exists (KANON trial) could not demonstrate that an immediate reconstruction is an added value (in terms of symptoms, knee function, activity level, osteoarthritis or incidental meniscal damage) compared to a conservative approach consisting of progressive rehabilitation and delayed surgery if there was persistent knee instability.
In a future multicenter RCT the investigators want to 1) verify these results and 2) search for predictors that predict which patients from the conservative group do well without delayed surgery. This information is invaluable to physicians as it allows them to decide which treatment is best for the patient.
Before performing a large, adequately-powered RCT that compares both treatment options, the investigators will run a pilot study that assesses the feasibility to recruit ACL patients for such RCT. This seems necessary, as many patients still believe that timely surgery is a prerequisite for restoring knee function, for returning to sports and for preventing cartilage degeneration. These preferences for surgery might affect recruitment and adherence to the protocol. Therefore, a pilot study will performed that demonstrates whether a large RCT is feasible with regard to 1) participant recruitment, 2) adherence to the treatment arm they were allocated to and 3) protocol feasibility. The findings of this pilot study will help deciding about progressing to a future definitive RCT.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Rotational trauma to a previously uninjured knee within the preceding 4 weeks
- •Medical diagnosis of ACL insufficiency including MRI (both partial and complete ruptures)
- •Minimum of 18 years
排除标准
- •Patient has history of a previous ACL injury or knee surgery to the index knee.
- •Indication for acute surgery because of related injuries to the knee
- •Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardise participant's safety or compliance with the protocol.
- •Female who is pregnant. Since MRI assessment cannot be performed.
结局指标
主要结局
Feasibility to recruit patients: Number of eligible patients that sign the informed consent
时间窗: 4 months after first patient in
Number of eligible patients that sign the informed consent
次要结局
- Feasibility of the protocol: Number of patients that complete all assessments(When 5 patients per site have completed the 3 month follow-up visit)
