Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04408690
NCT04408690
Completed
Phase 3

A Pilot Study to Investigate the Feasibility of Conducting a Randomized Controlled Trial That Compares Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair for Treatment of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven2 sites in 1 country29 target enrollmentSeptember 15, 2020

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Enrollment
29
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Feasibility to recruit patients: Number of eligible patients that sign the informed consent
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Currently, most patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury undergo surgery. There is a general belief that surgical reconstruction is necessary to return to sport safely and to limit premature knee osteoarthrosis or additional meniscal damage. However, there is unsufficient scientific evidence for this belief. Moreover, several studies show that a reconstruction does not guarantee successful return to sports or the prevention of osteoarthritis or meniscal injuries at all. Therefore, an immediate surgery after an ACL injury is more and more questioned. The only qualitative RCT that exists (KANON trial) could not demonstrate that an immediate reconstruction is an added value (in terms of symptoms, knee function, activity level, osteoarthritis or incidental meniscal damage) compared to a conservative approach consisting of progressive rehabilitation and delayed surgery if there was persistent knee instability.

In a future multicenter RCT the investigators want to 1) verify these results and 2) search for predictors that predict which patients from the conservative group do well without delayed surgery. This information is invaluable to physicians as it allows them to decide which treatment is best for the patient.

Before performing a large, adequately-powered RCT that compares both treatment options, the investigators will run a pilot study that assesses the feasibility to recruit ACL patients for such RCT. This seems necessary, as many patients still believe that timely surgery is a prerequisite for restoring knee function, for returning to sports and for preventing cartilage degeneration. These preferences for surgery might affect recruitment and adherence to the protocol. Therefore, a pilot study will performed that demonstrates whether a large RCT is feasible with regard to 1) participant recruitment, 2) adherence to the treatment arm they were allocated to and 3) protocol feasibility. The findings of this pilot study will help deciding about progressing to a future definitive RCT.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 15, 2020
End Date
March 3, 2023
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Rotational trauma to a previously uninjured knee within the preceding 4 weeks
  • Medical diagnosis of ACL insufficiency including MRI (both partial and complete ruptures)
  • Minimum of 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient has history of a previous ACL injury or knee surgery to the index knee.
  • Indication for acute surgery because of related injuries to the knee
  • Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardise participant's safety or compliance with the protocol.
  • Female who is pregnant. Since MRI assessment cannot be performed.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Feasibility to recruit patients: Number of eligible patients that sign the informed consent

Time Frame: 4 months after first patient in

Number of eligible patients that sign the informed consent

Secondary Outcomes

  • Feasibility of the protocol: Number of patients that complete all assessments(When 5 patients per site have completed the 3 month follow-up visit)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials