Ultherapy™ Treatment Following Sculptra® Treatment
- Conditions
- Skin Laxity
- Interventions
- Device: Ulthera® SystemOther: Sculptra® treatment followed by Ultherapy™ treatmentDrug: Sculptra®
- Registration Number
- NCT01422538
- Lead Sponsor
- Ulthera, Inc
- Brief Summary
This clinical trial will evaluate clinical outcomes associated with the non-invasive Ultherapy™ treatment to improve skin laxity and tightening following a Sculptra® treatment.
- Detailed Description
This study is a prospective,single-center, randomized clinical trial. Up to thirty (30) subjects will be treated. Enrolled subjects will be assigned to one of three (3) groups. Up to 10 subjects per group.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- Male or female, aged 35 to 60 years.
- Subject in good health.
- Skin laxity in the lower face and neck.
- Grade 1 and 2 on the Knize Scale
- Presence of an active systemic or local skin disease that may affect wound healing.
- Severe solar elastosis.
- Excessive subcutaneous fat in the face and neck.
- Excessive skin laxity on the face and neck.
- No scarring in areas to be treated.
- Any open facial wounds or lesions.
- Acne on the face.
- Patients who have a history with keloid formation or hypertropic scarring
- Patients who have a hypersensitivity to injectable poly-L-lactic acid
- Presence of a metal stent or implant in the facial area to be treated.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group A Ulthera® System Subjects will receive Ulthera® System alone. Group C Sculptra® treatment followed by Ultherapy™ treatment Sculptra® treatment followed by Ultherapy™ treatment Group B Sculptra® Sculptra® only
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Lifting and Tightening of Skin as Determined by Masked Assessment of Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs. 90 days post-treatment Three masked assessors reviewed pre- and 90 days post-treatment photos from 29 subjects who returned for their 90-day follow-up visit, assessing for improvement in skin laxity at 90 days post-treatment compared to baseline, i.e., lifted and tightened skin in the areas treated with the assigned study treatment based on the assigned study arm.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall Aesthetic Improvement at 180 Days Post-treatment 180 days post-treatment At 180 days post-treatment, each site investigator and each subject completed a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) (Physician GAIS - PGAIS; Subject GAIS - SGAIS), comparing to pre-treatment photos. The GAIS is 5-point scale (1-5) describing an overall assessment as follows:
1. = Very Much Improved
2. = Much Improved
3. = Improved
4. = No Change
5. = Worse "Any Improvement" includes subjects assessed in categories 1-3.Subject Satisfaction at 180 Days Post-treatment 180 days post-treatment Subjects rated their satisfaction as Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Dissatisfied or Very Dissatisfied using a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ). Responses at 180 days post-treatment Responses were tabulated.
Overall Aesthetic Improvement at 90 Days Post-treatment 90 days post-treatment. At 90 days post-treatment, each site investigator and each subject completed a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) (Physician GAIS - PGAIS; Subject GAIS - SGAIS), comparing to pre-treatment photos. The GAIS is 5-point scale (1-5) describing an overall assessment as follows:
1. = Very Much Improved
2. = Much Improved
3. = Improved
4. = No Change
5. = Worse "Any Improvement" includes subjects assessed in categories 1-3.Subject Satisfaction at 90 Days Post-treatment 90 days post-treatment. Subjects rated their satisfaction as Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Dissatisfied or Very Dissatisfied using a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ). Responses at 90 days post-treatment Responses were tabulated.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
EpiCentre Park Lane
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States