Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Sarcomas

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Sarcoma
Metastatic Disease
Bony Sites

Interventions: Radiation: SBRT

Registration Number: NCT01763970

Lead Sponsor: Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

Brief Summary: The stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) literature focuses on clinical outcomes in the adult population. However, SBRT has a particularly strong rationale for application in pediatrics given that high biologically effective doses have been shown to increase control in histologies, such as sarcoma, which are common in the pediatrics population. With stereotactic radiation therapy techniques, a reduction in normal tissue dose surrounding the target lesion of interest may also be accomplished resulting in lower toxicity. Given that pediatric patients with sarcomas, presenting with limited metastases in lung and bone, are still considered to be a curable population with aggressive local therapy, SBRT could have a significant impact on outcomes in oligometastatic patients who may be otherwise unresectable.

Detailed Description: Pediatric patients with sarcoma who have limited metastases are still potentially curable with aggressive local therapy. However, conventional moderate dose radiation is unlikely to provide durable local control. Given the recent technologic advances in radiation delivery, it is now possible to deliver tumoricidal doses, using stereotactic radiation over a short time course with highly focal techniques. Stereotactic radiation has proven efficacious in the intracranial setting and in multiple extracranial sites in adults. It has not yet been well studied in the pediatrics population where there is a particularly strong rationale due to the ablative doses that can be delivered to tumor while simultaneously reducing high dose to normal tissues. The proposed trial is a single arm phase II study to determine the efficacy of SBRT in pediatric sarcomas with surgically unresectable metastatic disease. Oligometastatic sites eligible for treatment in this study include bony sites of disease. SBRT will be delivered to each eligible site to a total dose of 4000 delivered in 5 fractions of 800 per fractions each day. Following completion of SBRT, patients will undergo treatment response assessment with the use of diagnostic imaging, clinical examination, and completion of the Brief Pain Inventory to assess quality of life. The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of SBRT delivered to a dose of 4000 centigray (cGy) in 5 fractions of 800 cGy each for patients greater than 3 years of age and \< 40 years of age with metastatic disease of bone secondary to pediatric sarcoma. The secondary objectives of this study include describing the toxicity of SBRT with this regimen; assessing clinical response rate of each target lesion; assessing long-term clinical outcomes; and assessing quality of life following completion of treatment. For patients with potentially curable oligometastatic disease, surgical resection in conjunction with systemic therapy remains the standard of care. Patients on this study will continue to receive chemotherapy outside of the 2 week window for SBRT. Issues that may limit participation include our inability to assess late effects that may not develop till at least 10 years after therapy. For this reason, we will limit the population in this study to patients who are surgically unresectable and would be otherwise incurable with current standard systemic therapies.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 14

Inclusion Criteria

histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic sarcoma of the soft tissue or bone
must have measurable disease
disease must be surgically unresectable as determined by a tumor board or surgeon
greater than 3 years of age
less than or equal to 40 years of age
life expectancy of at least 9 months
adequate performance status (Lansky Performance Status greater than or equal to 50).
ability to understand and willingness to sign informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria

patients who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior to entering the study
patients who have had any prior radiotherapy to the treatment site(s)
patients may not participate on any other treatment protocol while they are receiving treatment on this protocol and for up to 3 months after these protocol treatments have ended
pregnant women
refusal of women of child bearing potential to take a pregnancy test prior to treatment

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Hypofractionated SBRT	SBRT	800 cGy delivered in 5 fractions every day to total dose of 4000 cGy

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Lesion-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by Percentage of Lesions Locally Controlled	6 months post-SBRT	Local control was defined as the absence of local progression. Local progression was defined as: * (1) the development of a new soft tissue mass ≥1 cm at a site without a soft tissue component or with a soft tissue component \<1 cm in at baseline * (2) an increase in the largest axial dimension of the soft tissue component by \>20% in lesions with a ≥ 1 cm in soft tissue component at baseline * (3) a previous bone metastasis that was avid on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET), became non-avid after SBRT, and then became avid again. The Kaplan-Meier method was used.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Patient-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by the Percentage of Patients Locally Controlled	6 months post-SBRT	Patient-specific local control was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from initiation of SBRT to time of local failure. Patients who did not experience local failure were censored at the time of last follow up.
Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT	6 months post-SBRT	The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival from initiation of SBRT to death due to any cause. Patients who had not died at the time of the analysis were censored at the time of last follow up.
Percentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT	6 months post-SBRT	To assess long-term clinical outcomes of this patient population after completion of SBRT by measuring progression-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine progression-free for survival from initiation of SBRT to progression (local or distant) or death due to any cause. Patients that did not have evidence of progression or who did not die, where censored at the time of last follow up.
Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity of SBRT	12 months after treatment starts	To describe the toxicity of SBRT delivered to study patients measured by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory	Baseline and one-month post-SBRT	Quality of life was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) form which assesses the severity of pain and impact on functioning on an 11-point scale at each follow up visit. Paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to assess changes in pain scores on the Brief Pain Inventory; 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.

Trial Locations

Locations (5): Mayo Clinic
🇺🇸
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Sibley Memorial Hospital
🇺🇸
Washington, District of Columbia, United States
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
🇺🇸
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Stanford Medical Center
🇺🇸
Stanford, California, United States
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
🇺🇸
Memphis, Tennessee, United States